Search results

False. We teach that those who are cast into the lake of fire are without life. It doesn't mean that they are annihilated. It doesn't mean they have life. It means that they will continue to exist apart from God. False dichotomy. One does not have to have life in order to exist. Where did...

So can you. Saying it doesn't make it so. Jesus is called the Alpha and Omega. Yes, He got His human nature from Mary. But His Father was God the Father. That makes Him God by nature.

Russell was a fraud and a false prophet. We reject the teachings of false prophets, not give them credit.

Your words aren't God's.

Is a plural word. The "-im" ending makes it so.

Thank you for conceding the entire discussion. It isn't possible to lie to something that isn't a person. Thus, when Luke recorded Peter in Acts 5:3-4 as saying "Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit..." then we know, based on your own admission, that the Holy...

The only one here who's Catholic is Idolater. Everyone else is protestant. You're beating at a straw man. John 1:1 was written in Greek, not Hebrew. And Charles Russell (the founder of the Watchtower Society) didn't know Greek. He's the one who asserted that John 1:1 should read "a god"...

Are you asserting Jesus is not good? If so, what about Jesus makes Him not good? If you're not asserting that Jesus is not good, then that means he IS good, and therefore God, no? Sure, but that doesn't mean that EVERYTHING is symbolism. Please tell us, if "eternal punishment" is symbolism...

Is it possible to lie to something that is not a person? No? Then how could Ananias and Saphira have lied to the Holy Spirit, when the Holy Spirit isn't a person, but just a force?

I get your aversion to the first man grabbing the woman. It shows your conscience isn't completely seared. A man cannot grab the woman who loves him? This is the Religion section, not Politics. The point of the analogy is to show you that God is the second man, healthy in his mind, who will...

What about the people who don't want to live with God for eternity? Where is He supposed to put them?

So you're saying Jesus was wrong when He said Matthew 25:46?

I didn't come up with it. Someone else did. I was literally agreeing with you in my previous post. Now you're saying you were wrong? The place where God isn't. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less. People who reject God will be happier for eternity there in the place that God isn't than...

You're still not answering my question, so let's move on. Was Jesus good?

Saying it doesn't make it so. Not part of the analogy. I was telling you what the parts of the analogy meant, Arty. That's not revising it. That's called explaining it. False. Yes, that is exactly what God sending the unbeliever to hell is. "Supporting them being happy living without Him...

If this is true, God is unjust.

You're arguing against Arminianism. No one here (as far as I'm aware) is Arminian in their beliefs. Either way, your beliefs make God to be unjust.

I'm talking about in my analogy, KJ. Don't be dumb.

Yes, they do. Which is why it's so important to witness to the lost! Saying it doesn't make it so. No, it doesn't. Agreed. If the woman didn't love the man, and he wasn't unhealthy, then he would allow the woman to permanently leave Him. No. You've got it backwards. The place the good...

I will as soon as you answer the question. In my above analogy, which man is good, and which man is evil?