Search results

No, making the Bible mean nothing doesn't rehabilitate it. It utterly destroys any meaning it might have. Straw man. Correct. I don't have any initial disagreements with this statement. What, if anything, do you mean by "religion"? This is a Christian board. By "religion," do you mean...

I'm not "trying at" anything. Too bad. Yes, all of the creatures in this world were formed for man to have dominion over. Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness; let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over the cattle...

You're still not getting it. The passage isn't describing "when." It's describing "what." Chapter 1 gives the "when."

Except they're not. No, it's not. Repentance from sin is simply turning away from sin. I know what it means. It means to change one's mind. If anyone needs to look it up, it's you. Then why did Paul say it wasn't necessary to be water baptized? False.

No, it doesn't, for the reason I outlined above. Saying it doesn't make it so. You'd be wrong. The Pentateuch was, with a few verses excepted, written by one man, his name was Moses, a Hebrew from the tribe of Levi. Yes, that's what I said. If that's what you think I said, then your...

Facts don't care about your feelings. What constitutes "truly repenting of sin"? Because I don't find that in the bible. What I find is Romans 10:9-10. What I find is Ephesians 2:8-9. Baptized how? Water? Water baptisms (plural) were something commanded of Israel by God, not of the Body of...

Yes, I know what you're referring to. It still doesn't say that man was created before animals. In case you didn't realize it, Hebrew writing (like most history books) starts by giving a broad overview of events, and then delves deeper into the details afterwards. Genesis 1:1-2:3 gives the...

He's talking about Genesis 2:19. Working on a post that explains this.

No, it doesn't. Such as? False. Yup. And? So? The four Gospels were written by four different people. It's only natural that they give their different perspectives, and give their recollection of events in different ways and to differing degrees. Why do you assume they missed it...

Whatever that means... I respond to what is said, not what wasn't said. Special creation and a global flood. Only when you have evolution tinted glasses on. Take them off. After. No, it doesn't.

Humans have similar DNA to a sea sponge. Try again. They are evidence, but not for evolution.

Rather, it turns the Bible into meaningless mush. But I guess for someone who rejects God anyways, that's in your favor. Says the one who thinks the Bible should be irrational...

Clearly, you're wrong. Because you say so? Modern humans cannot. Humans of 5200 years ago, however, would have been MUCH more genetically diverse than modern humans, and DID diversify into what we have today. That period being... when? 5200 years ago? The lesson comes THROUGH the...

Wrong. How in the world did you arrive at that conclusion? Believing Israelites are under the New Covenant. Prior to God cutting off unbelieving, Israel, this was how to enter into a relationship with God. Prior to God cutting off unbelieving Israel, there was no such thing as the Body of...

No thanks.

I despise the HIV. I mean NIV. Can someone get saved through using it? Sure. But it's a terrible translation that leads people astray.

Yes, WE being THE BODY OF CHRIST. NOT those under the New Covenant, Israel. Which refers to the fact that now anyone can enter into a relationship with God, not just through Israel. My answer lies in 2 Timothy 2:15. Not what I meant and you know it. Men, as in, "the world," rather than a...

Saying it doesn't make it so. Not quite. No. There is no such thing as Jew or Gentile in the Body of Christ. Why is that so hard for your brain to grasp? Yes, those in the Body of Christ are one body with one head. No idea what you mean by "one foundation." Saying it doesn't make it so.

What are you talking about?

Such a god would be, by definition, unjust.