Search results

"Evidence" does not come from social media sites - X, Facebook, TikTok etc don't count, if you want it to be taken seriously that is. I get all sorts of stuff in my own feeds and wouldn't think about presenting any of it as evidence for a position unless it contains a link to a credible source...

Oh, so if the Ukrainian citizens had been armed they could have fought against their own army as well as the actual tyrannical dictator - Putin? Good to know! *facepalms*...

So that's a no on the whole verifying and corroborating it then? That's the kinda thing that adults, especially those with critical thinking skills do. But hey...

It wouldn't have made a blind bit of difference if Ukrainian citizens had arms or not where it came to Russia's invasion. Are you arguing that it would? Otherwise, there's few countries that have armed populations and nothing like the statistics of North America where it comes to gun crime.

Wouldn't have made a jot of difference against the barrage of artillery the Russians threw at Ukraine, or have you seen the pictures of Mariupol at all?

Have you verified and corroborated it? Else it's just like a talking head off TikTok. I hardly go there for news but if you're happy enough with your sources then crack on.

Do you think Ukrainian citizens being armed would have helped them ward off the Russian invasion?

It's actually Nick's.

Stick to your smileys, more substantive.

Oh, you mean the gigantic elephant in the White House room? That's as relevant now as it ever was and will continue to be until the files are released.

Your links are hardly an objective source of credible news either.

Well, it isn't obviously.

Oh, I saw enough of Biden's gaffes at the time and he really should have stepped down long before he did. Still, at least he didn't go on self praising diatribes amid the bizarre..

Telling that RD and JR seem only interested in chuckling drive by smiley's than actually addressing anything. Did I misrepresent your position Judge Rightly? By all means correct me if so.

I'm not lying at all. I thrashed this out with JR a while ago who can comment for himself. The bottom line was that children once born are not entitled to essentials like food, water, shelter, warmth etc and that it was up to the parent/s to provide and if they don't then it's pretty much tough...

If you're opposed to welfare then by association - in any realistic sense - you're tolerating a rise in poverty and homelessness among other things. For plenty, it's the only available lifeline to try and make ends meet. Not sure where you're getting the notion that the poor are overfed exactly...

The federal takeover of the police in DC did not happen "a month ago". What are you on about?

I ain't throwing stones at anybody and if you think I am then dude, grow a thicker skin. Ya wanna criticize Starmer then go for it, there's plenty of ammunition and chances are I'd agree with criticism you'd throw his way. This current lot over here have been an embarrassment since tenure.

I really don't want to "try and keep up thanks". Trump can barely put a coherent sentence together without spiraling off into bizarre and irrelevant ramblings and self obsessed diatribes.

If you have no problem with any of that then why on earth are you asking me that question?