Search results

Not quite. There is only circumcision and un-circumcision on earth. In Christ, there is no such thing. Those aren't our words, it is the scripture. 2 churches, not 3. Paul's letters and Acts of the Apostles bear out that there is a new church with different rules. Paul said he is the first saved...

Prison does not exist in the Bible as punishment.

Who or where is the executive authority of government? Where is it vested?

Paul was saved by faith alone. The covenant of circumcision requires keeping of the law of Moses. And yes, Paul was the first. It is to drive Israel to jealousy, but that is another topic and not the cross directly.

Speaking of things in the documents we use for justice, he was the one that voted (1-8) that a violent criminal should still have his arms. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. The bigger issue is in play, but the concept is correct. If he raped, murdered and stole, he should...

Acts 10 happens before the rebuke by Paul. He knew just going there was unlawful, but God told him to do it. And if the boss says you, then you can. 27 And as he talked with him, he went in and found many who had come together. 28 Then he said to them, “You know how unlawful it is for a Jewish...

I didn't contradict anything. So, no.

I was on X on my phone. Most discussions with the RCC quickly moves to "sola scriptura" because their positions are indefensible otherwise.

Paul repeats certain things in letters. He reconciled the world, including his enemies at the cross. He is not imputing trespasses. But, you are not indwelt with the Spirit until salvation. You have eternal life when he seals us into Christ.

The responses never move past "It is obvious symbolism".

Isn't really you reject all of his letters as authoritative? And claim he isn't part of the succession? It isn't a disqualifier, but if you peel the onion back you will find they also reject the gospel of grace.

That doesn't make it right.

Is there a point to your post?

Only for Israel.

I will lob grenades at anyone who perverts the gospel.

Because it is in the Federalist Papers, Declaration of Independence, or Constitution doesn't make it right. That is my point. Not to disparage him.

29 Then he called for a light, ran in, and fell down trembling before Paul and Silas. 30 And he brought them out and said, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” 31 So they said, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and you will be saved, you and your household. Luke recorded this event regarding...

I already know what it says, as do the others here. You're probably an idiot atheist who thinks he is trolling.