Search results

He doesn't even listen to cosmetic advice...

Yes, it was a disastrous play and led to Truss being the shortest serving prime minister. No, it wasn't Idolater. If you can't acknowledge that either myself or anna are not white supremacists or have any history of advocating or defending such on this forum then you've no business saying anna...

It's not going to be comfortable and I haven't followed that much news today though I did catch some of the chancellors statement earlier. Tough times ahead although at least it's leveling out a bit after Truss and Kwateng's disastrous stint as PM & chancellor. The GBP was practically level with...

Yeah, just gonna leave you to your bonkers "reality" from now on. Trump lost the election - fact. Biden has been president for nigh on three years - fact. Don't like it, meh, So what? Suck it up. You accuse me of being a white supremacist without a shred of support despite being invited to quote...

Hardly requires much psychology to work that out Idolater. The wingnut accuses anna and myself of being white supremacists among other conspiracy crap. You ever seen me or anna advocate or defend the like? Thought not.

All you've done is made yourself look like an immature clown with all of this. If that was your intent then hey, way to go. The reality of the situation is that Trump lost and was booted out of office nigh on three years ago, fact. I don't wear spray tan either. Still, you carry on as you like.

It's good to see that the radical likes of Kari Lake got kicked into touch and that a good number of people are fed up with all of the conspiracy garbage.

Apart from actual reality on the matter, that was...well...lame. Trump is a fake tanned clown, doesn't care about you or anyone else. Hardly the only politician on that score but just some free advice for ya.

I don't, I leave it to you, along with the kindergarten stuff. You've been asked a question for long enough and frankly, someone who thinks that Trump won the 2020 election hardly reaches a conclusion through evidence and reasoning.

Aw, doesn't work dude. He lost and there's no support for any conspiracy crap that he didn't. Best start learning to live with it, especially after three years. The denial is all yours and no inferring on the score required.

Take a chill pill dude. If you can't acknowledge that Trump lost the 2020 election then you're the election denier and that's not up for debate either, it's fact. Now, if you still can't accept this three years down the line then it's easy to infer that you have a problem with objective...

Rambling on does not help you. I quoted you directly in the latter part from your own post. Here it is again: "So, as long as you know that so and so is an accuser, you can easily know by inference that he/she is telling the truth or not telling the truth. Duh!"...

You seem to labour under many a delusion. I only call people white supremacists if their rhetoric incorporates such risible ideology. I certainly don't throw the term around with abandon around here. Quote me anywhere on this forum where I've advocated or defended such abhorrent views. I'll...

No, it wasn't. Had it stopped at the possibility that it could have been an air defense accident then perhaps. But as per usual, it went off into the realm of conspiracy rubbish.

Calling anna a white supremacist is as deranged as calling her an election denier. She, along with myself are neither white supremacists or have any truck with such and accept that Trump well and truly lost the 2020 election. One would have to be a monumental conspiracy dope to "think" otherwise.

It would seem that it may well be an accident although it's not fully clear even now. Certainly not a false flag operation. https://www.reuters.com/video/watch/idOV993116112022RP1

A lot of smileys but no answers again I note. Yes, of course an accuser is either telling the truth or not telling the truth. You claim that you can easily know by inference whether the accuser in question is doing either but won't explain as to how. I've already shown how ascertaining whether...

So, as predicted, you can't even explain your own post. Let me clue you in. It's not always easy to ascertain whether someone is being truthful or not so your inference stuff is just garbage. Someone could be telling you the truth about a certain matter and be highly convincing. Someone could...

Nah. You either explain this bit of word salad or don't: When you know that what an accuser is telling is the truth, it's very easy to know by inference therefrom that he/she is telling the truth. When you know that what an accuser is telling is not the truth, it's very easy to know by...

:LOL: Oh dear, I didn't realize you were one of those who bought into all that garbage so much. Trump lost. simple as.