Search results

When I mentioned ivermectin to my lefty sister when my mother had covid, she sneeringly referred to it as horse medicine. I should try asking about this one.

As long as you don't recognize them as persons, it's ok to murder them, right?

You mean toxic feminists, right?

Me too. But as we've discussed elsewhere, the definition of "rape" appears to be up in the air.

Kind of like saying masculinity depends on the ability of men to rape women.

And you get to define "honest"? So you're willing to accept everything every atheist has ever said about morality? Disbelieving doesn't make it false, either. Second hand would be ok? With multiple witnesses?

And between two times of judgment.

So they show that the "day" of judgment can last 1000 years. 😄 But besides that, there are two times of judgment given in Rev 20, one at the beginning and one at the end of the 1000 years. Revelation 20:4-6 (KJV) 4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them...

Matthew 10:15 (KJV) Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city. Hebrews 6:2 (KJV) Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment. 2 Peter 2:9...

Why then is the judgment normally talked about as occurring when Christ returns?

How soon?

Right. A and L were "far off" from Hades where RM was.

He didn’t even give them a chance to hijack anything.

The spirit returning to God can't be the person's soul, or else all people would be with God after they die, even the rich man who went to hell. This is specifically talking about the resurrection, and what that will look like. So it actually reinforces what @Hobie is saying.

Luke 16 doesn't actually say Lazarus and Abraham are in hell/hades. Go read it again.

That was a quick flameout.

He knows he's guilty--and he can figure out the antecedents in several ways.

The difference, of course, is that a person is dead whether a murder is proved or not, which is something God didn't want. But in the marital rape case, what happened was supposed to happen--God wanted it--just someone didn't like the timing.

Happy to do so, on anything the Catholics have correct.

Are you saying John's baptism was dry?