Search results

That the grand jury wasn't concerned that Keith was shot in the back Keith was shot in the back, yes. Why you confused libertarians insist on considering him a saint is beyond me. So far, your attempts to describe how you think I think have been an absolute disaster for you, and indicative of...

You WILL comply! @Stripe

I'm not interested in being an ally with a libertarian like you, especially a very confused libertarian like you. What a bizarre thing to say. So, confused, libertarian and taken to making bizarre statements. Bit of a weirdo, aren't you? By you and your fellow libertarians? Of course not...

Is that what you're identifying as, these days? Why would you consider that to be bad news? Does it have something to do with your new willingness to identify as a libertarian? Once again you are confused. It is YOU who continually refers to Keith as a Saint. From what I read in a quick...

Yes Yes it did It was false Because it was true Because that's the most contentious aspect of the controversy. If you say so. I just looked at the autopsy report. Unlikely You consider him a saint? Weird That's for a jury to decide

Only one hit the perp, contrary to your confused claim that Griffiths SHOT Keith four times. I can understand why you might be confused. People who aren't familiar with guns could easily be expected to confuse shooting somebody with shooting AT somebody. You consider him a saint?

Beats me. This one wasn't even on my radar before you posted. Wasn't hard to find information on it though. Feel free to ask them

Retards

Sounds exciting! Are you planning on taking the day off work?

Shot AT Keith four times. Apparently only one hit him. In the back.

And the statistic that proves anna is a racist - 6446 6446 young black men murdered in 2019, overwhelmingly by other young black men. Not by white supremicists. But to racists like anna, their lives don't matter.

Compare to:

8 Yes, that's right. 8

When they teach Thomas Sowell, I'll believe that their interest is in teaching honest history.

"Honest history" When they teach that Obama is descended from slave owners I'll believe that their interest is in teaching honest history. When they teach that Kamala Harris is descended from slave owners, I'll believe that their interest is in teaching honest history.

There's a reason that they are supposed to be done sequentially.

The goal of the left - not the radical left - the mainstream left - is open borders.

https://babylonbee.com/news/aoc-donates-casket-she-was-buried-in-on-january-6th-to-smithsonian

🤣🤣🤣🤣