Search results

I’ve been giving examples of your double standards. Why do I need to always give more than I’ve given already? That’s a double standard right there, as you don’t require it of yourself. I’ll wager you have never said, “Don’t believe what I’ve written, unless I provide more evidence than I have...

Once a person only accepts his own standards, it’s never possible for him to admit wrong. So the answer’s No.

You mean he's guilty until proven innocent? That's not how it works here. and again, you’re back to some standard that only you control—your opinion. Why should all news sites have to abide by that standard, especially when it’s duplicitous (that equates to hypocritical, as I’m sure you know)...

And I forgot to add that I'm sorry you're embarrassed when your media sources are shown to be fraudulent over the very thing you're claiming to be a fraud. Troll Hypocrisy #7

Troll Hypocrisy #6: why do require "objective, rational standards" for others, when you don't for yourself?

That was the same question I had about TGP and your hoops. Yet you still maintain that TGP is bad, and yours are good, purveyors of truth. Including about this particular issue where TGP reported correctly and yours reported falsely. Troll Hypocrisy #1 I agree! So why is your darling MSM...

If your sources said that Ben Cotton claimed the databases were not deleted (which they did), but Ben Cotton reiterated that he never said that (which he did), then those news sources you relied on have given false information. You tell me: Are they 1. crazy (in which case you should not rely...

Did we lose @iansmithedi ?

Don’t forget CNN and The Hill: https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/554250-firms-behind-arizona-election-audit-reverse-say-no-data-was-destroyed Though I don’t think they are crazy; I think they are purposely lying to their readers/viewers. Crazy is less morally at fault than lying. But you...

But you can't use anything from NewsNet. NewsNet is not an Arthur-Brain-approved source of evidence. That's because it reports news that is not in keeping with Arthur Brain's understanding of truth. All potential truth sources have to apply to @Arthur Brain for approval. Unfortunately, even the...

If we have assurance, does that mean we don't have to believe anymore? It seems to me, that if we are relying on Jesus Christ to save us, then our belief is in Him, not in any other type of assurance.

Now you're saying that sinners shouldn't bother coming to you for reasons for the hope that is in you. [1Pe 3:15 ESV] 15 but in your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with...

I guess the question should be, How was the equipment certified in the first place? Why would that be hard to do again? If the biggest concern from the SOS is that an in-depth audit might require recertification (which I would think is a given), does that mean those machines have NEVER been...

Then you don't agree that it is by the power of Jesus that all are raised from the dead? To whose power do you attribute the resurrection to condemnation? [Jhn 5:28-29 ESV] 28 Do not marvel at this, for an hour is coming when all who are in the tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those...

I’m not trying to be evasive, but I need to know what part you don’t understand about what I said.

Again, you judge based on your own opinions. My opinions are just as valid, if that’s what we’re going by. But it’s not. Eventually truth will prevail, just like it did on the Russia collusion thing. Why are your standards so tight against the audit, when so loose regarding bearing false...

Explain what?

Then you agree that it is Jesus’ death that will result in all people arising from the dead?

I provided evidence. You rejected it. If you are the arbiter of evidence for American elections, then we’re in big trouble. Fortunately, you aren’t. But you can’t anymore say there is no evidence, at least not truthfully. But you don’t seem to care about truth, based on your news sources.

Paul’s words fit the Genesis narrative. Jesus supported it. Why go looking for a different interpretation, except that you don’t believe the three witnesses.