Search results

While making a joke, there is actually strange evidence showing it is correct. Not that inhaling burning particulates is a good thing, it clearly isn't. But the body has nicotine receptors. Because it is a nutrient in certain vegetables, and not an addictive added chemical.

So at the very least, he is 10% right.

As you know, that has no bearing on whether he is right or wrong on this. He says many things wrong, and many things right.

There are reports floating saying Hantavirus is a side effect of the covid vaccine and of course the fake "fact check" saying it isn't true. Chatgpt gave me the link to Adverse Events of Special Interest The virus of no concern of mine, aside from the idiot panic buyers. Of course the release...

The late Rush Limbaugh was the first person I heard say Since there will be discovery, indictments from the SPLC might show her too. Alex Jones opined she shows signs of pharma induced schizophrenia.

I pose a question, because I see one of 2 choices. When staring truth in the face, is the person stupid or evil when they deny it? That is a real question, and the person, here and everywhere really, explodes. Rightly so I suppose, making them stupid. Right here recently on the concept of...

I didn't and that seems reasonable.

In this case, I am not looking for Bible verses, but the report on the spike at the garden tomb. I used chatgpt a couple of times to ask about first century meaning without a reference to the Bible.

From Luke's second letter to Theophilus, called Acts of the Apostles. This is long, but you should have read and studied it. I know many have. This is critical. This is what they clearly got wrong at the later councils by mixing the 2 gospels together. Where Peter and James agree with Paul and...

Is it money to you? What is the point of your scripture out of context and not germane to the discussion?

Then after fourteen years I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and also took Titus with me. And I went up by revelation, and communicated to them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to those who were of reputation, lest by any means I might run, or had run, in...

The rejection of Paul's authority is strange. I understand many don't know and have never picked up the Bible. But others are demonic and reject it, while claiming Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. They are of the devil, I have no doubt. He isn't confused. He rejects it.

And this person doesn't have any.

That is power. His position. He came lower than the angels. While still being divine. 7 But He emptied Himself, taking upon Himself the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in the form of a man, He humbled Himself and became obedient to death, even death on...

What if Abraham told him no. He can't kill his own child?

He isn't the only one. It is provable fraud. You cannot falsify government documents.

We need the mocking emoji back. And not the literal homo emojis provided.

Yes. On the first page of the Bible he refers to himself in a plural way. I just want to make sure all the information is taken in and understood. In the "New Testament" we are told one of the persons was emptied of his power. And he came lower than the angels. So him appearing lower does not...

And I just went and read a little more regarding his name "Petros" is a stone easily moved. At least he didn't call him Satan this time. And that is secondary to the fact that the church was Israel. Not the body today.

I don't read a lick of Greek and I know what he said. And it is moot. That church is Israel. The church in the wilderness. That is not the church today. They have been set aside. Read what leads up to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.