31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

expos4ever

Well-known member
No responsible health investigation ever proved Aaron's death had nothing to do with the covid vaccine.
Moving the goalposts!

I never denied that Mr. Aaron's death was due to the vaccine.

Your lie was the claim that it was due to the vaccine.
 

expos4ever

Well-known member
Then you called me a liar for saying something you failed to prove was a lie.
All right, let's do this real nice and slow.

You posted this:

"You call me a liar for saying vaccinated people can get covid"

You cannot deny this - the proof is in the transcript of this thread.

This statement of yours is a lie, a falsehood, a fiction, a mendacity.

How do we know this? Because I guarantee that you cannot demonstrate that I ever called you a liar for saying vaccinated people can get covid.

Marke, you are a liar.

Own it, because it is a demonstrable fact.
 

marke

Well-known member
All right, let's do this real nice and slow.

You posted this:

"You call me a liar for saying vaccinated people can get covid"

You cannot deny this - the proof is in the transcript of this thread.

This statement of yours is a lie, a falsehood, a fiction, a mendacity.

How do we know this? Because I guarantee that you cannot demonstrate that I ever called you a liar for saying vaccinated people can get covid.

Marke, you are a liar.

Own it, because it is a demonstrable fact.
Now you are calling me a liar for claiming you falsely called me a liar in a post in which you never proved I lied.
 

User Name

Well-known member
But the experts say that the vaccines don't work, per Israel, and that ivermectin/hydroxychloroquine/other ionophore + zinc + vitamins work, per Utter Pradesh.
The experts say no such things, of course:

The BBC can reveal that more than a third of 26 major trials of ivermectin for use on Covid have serious errors or signs of potential fraud. None of the rest show convincing evidence of ivermectin's effectiveness.
Dr Kyle Sheldrick, one of the group investigating the studies, said they had not found "a single clinical trial" claiming to show that ivermectin prevented Covid deaths that did not contain "either obvious signs of fabrication or errors so critical they invalidate the study".
Major problems included:
  • The same patient data being used multiple times for supposedly different people
  • Evidence that selection of patients for test groups was not random
  • Numbers unlikely to occur naturally
  • Percentages calculated incorrectly
  • Local health bodies unaware of the studies
The scientists in the group - Dr Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Dr James Heathers, Dr Nick Brown and Dr Sheldrick - each have a track record of exposing dodgy science. They've been working together remotely on an informal and voluntary basis during the pandemic.
They formed a group looking deeper into ivermectin studies after biomedical student Jack Lawrence spotted problems with an influential study from Egypt. Among other issues, it contained patients who turned out to have died before the trial started. It has now been retracted by the journal that published it.

 

expos4ever

Well-known member
Now you are calling me a liar for claiming you falsely called me a liar in a post in which you never proved I lied.
No, I am calling you a liar because these threads testify, in grisly glory, as to your pattern of systematically lying.

Once more: you posted this:

"You call me a liar for saying vaccinated people can get covid"

This statement of yours, marke, is what we call a lie -you are deliberately asserting something you know to be false, namely that I have called you a liar for saying vaccinated people can get covid.

We all know that vaccinated people can get covid! And what is more relevant, I never, repeat NEVER called you a liar for saying something that I know to be true - that vaccinated people can get covid.

This is a fact, marke - there is not a shred of evidence anywhere in these threads to the effect that I called you a liar for saying that vaccinated people can get covid.
 

User Name

Well-known member
Define "vaccine"
You obviously aren't very intelligent if you don't know what a vaccine is and furthermore you could look it up yourself if you really wanted to know. You would also know that "breakthrough" cases in vaccinated individuals are generally milder than cases among the unvaccinated, and hospitalizations and deaths among the vaccinated are comparatively rare. You would know all of this already if you really wanted to know the truth, but of course you have no interest in that.
 

ok doser

Well-known member
You obviously aren't very intelligent if you don't know what a vaccine is and furthermore you could look it up yourself if you really wanted to know. You would also know that "breakthrough" cases in vaccinated individuals are generally milder than cases among the unvaccinated, and hospitalizations and deaths among the vaccinated are comparatively rare. You would know all of this already if you really wanted to know the truth, but of course you have no interest in that.
It's not that hard - go on Google and type in "definition of vaccine"

Cut and paste the results that you get in your next response 😁
 

marke

Well-known member
You obviously aren't very intelligent if you don't know what a vaccine is and furthermore you could look it up yourself if you really wanted to know. You would also know that "breakthrough" cases in vaccinated individuals are generally milder than cases among the unvaccinated, and hospitalizations and deaths among the vaccinated are comparatively rare. You would know all of this already if you really wanted to know the truth, but of course you have no interest in that.
Covid vaccines are not conventional vaccines and have only been used as vaccine alternatives for a very short time.


Nucleic acid therapeutics have emerged as promising alternatives to conventional vaccine approaches. The first report of the successful use of in vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA in animals was published in 1990, when reporter gene mRNAs were injected into mice and protein production was detected5. A subsequent study in 1992 demonstrated that administration of vasopressin-encoding mRNA in the hypothalamus could elicit a physiological response in rats6. However, these early promising results did not lead to substantial investment in developing mRNA therapeutics, largely owing to concerns associated with mRNA instability, high innate immunogenicity and inefficient in vivo delivery. Instead, the field pursued DNA-based and protein-based therapeutic approaches7,8.
 

Yorzhik

Well-known member
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
The experts say no such things, of course:

The BBC can reveal that more than a third of 26 major trials of ivermectin for use on Covid have serious errors or signs of potential fraud. None of the rest show convincing evidence of ivermectin's effectiveness.
Dr Kyle Sheldrick, one of the group investigating the studies, said they had not found "a single clinical trial" claiming to show that ivermectin prevented Covid deaths that did not contain "either obvious signs of fabrication or errors so critical they invalidate the study".
Major problems included:
  • The same patient data being used multiple times for supposedly different people
  • Evidence that selection of patients for test groups was not random
  • Numbers unlikely to occur naturally
  • Percentages calculated incorrectly
  • Local health bodies unaware of the studies
The scientists in the group - Dr Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, Dr James Heathers, Dr Nick Brown and Dr Sheldrick - each have a track record of exposing dodgy science. They've been working together remotely on an informal and voluntary basis during the pandemic.
They formed a group looking deeper into ivermectin studies after biomedical student Jack Lawrence spotted problems with an influential study from Egypt. Among other issues, it contained patients who turned out to have died before the trial started. It has now been retracted by the journal that published it.

The charts don't lie. But no one is going to run a clinical study on what might as well be a generic drug.

The difference is the establishment is desperate to create a narrative that says only vaccines work, while people that care, including a great number of experts, can show that invermectin works. The establishment won't look into experts suspicions of problems with the vaccines because they don't care about people.

Beyond that, the vast majority of people will have a better chance of surviving COVID than risking the long term problems with the vaccination. Even if the sickness is worse without the vaccination, it will be about the same as the regular flu at worst. And they will be immune from getting it again. Even the variants will be less dangerous.

So why do you believe the BBC whenyou know they don't care about people dying?
 

User Name

Well-known member
The charts don't lie.
No, they don't:

"Uttar Pradesh is leading India's Covid-19 vaccination drive..."


"A stringent 'trace, test and treat' measure, vaccination and partial curfews have paid dividends in restricting Covid-19 spread."

 

Yorzhik

Well-known member
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
No, they don't:
Yes they did.
"Uttar Pradesh is leading India's Covid-19 vaccination drive..."


"A stringent 'trace, test and treat' measure, vaccination and partial curfews have paid dividends in restricting Covid-19 spread."

You're like a zombie banging on a keyboard! 😅 😄 :D :LOL: :ROFLMAO: 😅 :D :LOL: 😄 😅

Again, UP didn't ramp up vaccines until after ivermectin had already brought down the numbers to no-big-deal. And the new regime stopped the use of invermectin... and despite the huge increase in vaccines, the numbers went back up!

Dude, you already knew this. Do you even listen to yourself?
 

ffreeloader

Well-known member
Yes they did.

You're like a zombie banging on a keyboard! 😅 😄 :D :LOL: :ROFLMAO: 😅 :D :LOL: 😄 😅

Again, UP didn't ramp up vaccines until after ivermectin had already brought down the numbers to no-big-deal. And the new regime stopped the use of invermectin... and despite the huge increase in vaccines, the numbers went back up!

Dude, you already knew this. Do you even listen to yourself?
Truth has zero priority with UN.
 
Top