Answering old threads thread

Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Derf said:
So you're pretty much admitting that it's a crime without a criminal--except for the very rare case, like Hunter Biden, where they videotaped themselves doing some kind of onerous activity, like sadomasochism or bondage. You know, "something else". For someone who disagrees with me so virulently, you seem to come to the same conclusions--though you don't admit it.
Click to expand...
Of course it has a criminal. If a husband forces sex onto his wife he's a rapist - ergo a criminal. Your bizarre ramble about Hunter Biden has nothing to do with rape so no, I don't in any way come to anything resembling your warped conclusions at all.
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Derf said:
Never said it did. But even if it happens, it's not rape.

Consider this scenario. A married couple has sex on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. Afterward, the wife complains to a friend about Tuesday's tryst, which friend gets incensed about the husband forcing himself on her, and convinces her to file rape charges because she wasn't feeling up to sex that day. What should the judge's verdict be, and what should be the punishment, if he's found guilty?
Click to expand...
Heck, maybe this stuff does need to be spoonfed to the likes of you and Stripe.

If the wife complains to her friend that she wasn't happy about Tuesdays "tryst" because she didn't feel like sex but her husband forced it on her anyway then her friend is right to call that rape. Given the vagueness of your hypothetical she could be complaining that the sex just wasn't that great or whatever in which case it's not rape. The whole scenario lacks any sort of cogent detail as to specifics and is therefore lame.

Clear now?
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Stripe said:
Then respond honestly to the scenario that he presented.

There was no force involved.

You made it up.
Click to expand...
I've responded to this once again with baby steps so the pair of you might be able to keep up. In the scenario presented it was too vague as to what the wife was unhappy about as outlined in my last. What isn't vague is your asinine nonsense about stating that I consider it rape if a woman has regrets after sex. If you repeat that garbage then it's an outright lie as I've never come close to stating such, ya got that?

Yay.
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Stripe said:
Hello there, Stupid.

I'm not advocating Fred's ideas.

You judged a man guilty in the hypothetical situation where a woman had regret.

You can't edit the posts. They are right there.
Click to expand...
Why hey there you...strange person.

Good for you cos they're indefensible.

Nope, sure didn't as any honest reading would establish and especially after having to walk you through it all and everything and no reason to edit my posts anyway.

If you perpetuate the same asinine nonsense about how I consider it to be rape if a woman has regrets after sex then you're a liar. Was monumentally dumb of you to assert such to begin with but to repeat such would just be lies and you don't want that, do you?
 
ok doser

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Derf said:
Consider this scenario. A married couple has sex on Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. Afterward, the wife complains to a friend about Tuesday's tryst, which friend gets incensed about the husband forcing himself on her, and convinces her to file rape charges because she wasn't feeling up to sex that day. What should the judge's verdict be, and what should be the punishment, if he's found guilty?
Click to expand...
The wife complains to a friend
The friend gets incensed

Clearly the wife was the victim of a brutal rape that left her bruised and emotionally and psychologically broken. Clearly the husband should be summarily executed.

Just as clearly the wife should be executed for consensually engaging in sex on Wednesday with a brutal rapist. Her willingness to engage in sex on Wednesday makes her an accessory after the fact.

The friend should be executed just for being an annoying pain in the neck


Stripe said:
Hello there, Stupid.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Idolater

Idolater

"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
ok doser said:
The wife complains to a friend
The friend gets incensed

Clearly the wife was the victim of a brutal rape that left her bruised and emotionally and psychologically broken. Clearly the husband should be summarily executed. ...
Click to expand...
The difficulty in convincing a jury that a rape occurred, is cosmically, in one sense (and it's an important one), in the defense of justice, because you're absolutely right, it is the only thing that defends innocent people against felony perjurers like this one.

It doesn't have anything to do with our absolute, inalienable right against being raped as people. Even if you can't ever prove a murder, still murder is absolutely wrong, and our right against being murdered is still just as absolute.
 
Derf

Derf

Well-known member
Idolater said:
The difficulty in convincing a jury that a rape occurred, is cosmically, in one sense (and it's an important one), in the defense of justice, because you're absolutely right, it is the only thing that defends innocent people against felony perjurers like this one.

It doesn't have anything to do with our absolute, inalienable right against being raped as people. Even if you can't ever prove a murder, still murder is absolutely wrong, and our right against being murdered is still just as absolute.
Click to expand...
The difference, of course, is that a person is dead whether a murder is proved or not, which is something God didn't want. But in the marital rape case, what happened was supposed to happen--God wanted it--just someone didn't like the timing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top