Wow! That "you're presuming your position is correct, and then fitting everything to that presupposed conclusion" comes straight from the pamphlet, "How to Impress/Woo the Audience with Cliches/Soundbytes, When You Are Stumped, That Really Says NADA."'you're presuming your position is correct, and then fitting everything to that presupposed conclusion.' I know my position is according to God's revealed truth written in the New Testament (2Tim3:15-17)
I wholeheartedly know that Christ is my Great High Priest and Advocate.
I don't care to know anything about dispensationalism be it trans or any other gender.
So, the mutt admits that he/she/it is lost, as only the lost, a sinner,are/is in need of a High Priest.And thanks for confirming you never read the OT, much less studied its details, including the role of the High Priest.
Pathetic. Sit, Boy.
I understand the teaching of the letter to the Hebrews which gives a full understanding of Jesus fulfilling all the High priesthood figure of the Old Covenant.
I don't need to study the Old Testament to know Jesus our Great High Priest.
You need to repent of your rude insulting name calling. Show 'heavenly' behaviour and thus glorify Christ name!
:juggle:Do you believe Christ's Resurrection really happened (Ro10:9KJV)? Then you're justified/saved (Ro4:25KJV). Catholicism believes that "the Catholic faithful" and "others who believe in Christ," are both in "a certain . . . communion with the Catholic Church," and we know what believing in Christ, means believing that He is risen (2Ti2:8KJV).
Juggling balls yourself.:juggle:
Then you ought to know all about the episcopal office of the Church, especially given your scripture reference, which is taken from a letter that Paul wrote to a member of that same office, to Bishop Timothy, a bishop whom Paul himself consecrated through the imposition of his own hands upon Timothy.'you're presuming your position is correct, and then fitting everything to that presupposed conclusion.' I know my position is according to God's revealed truth written in the New Testament (2Tim3:15-17)
Exactly none of that was made up.Made up.
I don't.Those, like yourself, who include works
It's not possible to lose your salvation over a doctrinal difference, so long as you maintain belief in Christ's Resurrection., as a basis of the LORD God's acceptance, justification, pervert the gospel of Christ, making the resurrection of no affect, and the Lord Jesus Christ died in vain.
All you need to do is believe that Christ's Resurrection was an historical event, a fact of history, nonfiction. That is when the Spirit of God comes to dwell with you. This is what the episcopal office of the Catholic Church teaches: "those who believe in Christ know the Spirit because he dwells with them."Get saved, wolf.
You were doing the juggling. I just pointed it out.Juggling balls yourself.
I'm not juggling anything. That you're perceiving me juggling---idk what to tell you. :idunno:You were doing the juggling. I just pointed it out.
All you need to do is believe that Christ's Resurrection was an historical event, a fact of history, nonfiction. That is when the Spirit of God comes to dwell with you. This is what the episcopal office of the Catholic Church teaches: "those who believe in Christ know the Spirit because he dwells with them."
John, You may consider yourself wise and understanding but it is 'earthly, unspiritual devilish' wisdom(James3:7-17).
Do you believe Christ's Resurrection really happened (Ro10:9KJV)? Then you're justified/saved (Ro4:25KJV). Catholicism believes that "the Catholic faithful" and "others who believe in Christ," are both in "a certain . . . communion with the Catholic Church," and we know what believing in Christ, means believing that He is risen (2Ti2:8KJV).
Sure you were. Look at that silly post of yours.I'm not juggling anything. That you're perceiving me juggling---idk what to tell you. :idunno:
lol. With which part do you disagree? That it's the truth of the matter, or that the Church's Magisterium teaches it?Made up. You winged that, deceiver.
That's what they're talking about. Communion has the word 'union' right in it, as in 'uno,' one. One Body of Christ. All those who believe in Christ, are one Church.What is "a certain . . . communion"? Why the dots?
What about the ONE BODY?
Why the strange "qualification" and the DOTS?That's what they're talking about. Communion has the word 'union' right in it, as in 'uno,' one. One Body of Christ. All those who believe in Christ, are one Church.
lol. With which part do you disagree? That it's the truth of the matter, or that the Church's Magisterium teaches it?