chrysostom’s 2013 annual awards

[Arthur Brain]

Oh well, no need to try and make me feel responsible in some way and besides Rusha is a big girl with the whole of the TOL strong arms at her disposal.

This is just bizarre. SOD has a history of being a complete pleb here, Eeset has made uncalled for remarks regarding TH's family and you seem to be making everyone else out to be part of some massive 'covert neg rep' operation. It's bloody tiresome. I haven't negged any of you but I can sure see why others would...though even then it wouldn't be part of a 'gang'.

 

[sky.]

This is just bizarre. SOD has a history of being a complete pleb here, Eeset has made uncalled for remarks regarding TH's family and you seem to be making everyone else out to be part of some massive 'covert neg rep' operation. It's bloody tiresome. I haven't negged any of you but I can sure see why others would...though even then it wouldn't be part of a 'gang'.

I think you need to go back and read the thread.

 

[resurrected]

perhaps now you're beginning to understand why I call our challenged little friend "tardlyartie"


he's a bit slow

 

[resurrected]

Town and anna think the Golden Rule means that when someone takes a swipe at you you're justifed in taking a swipe back at them ten times as hard? :freak:

Is that how bullies justify their behavior?

 

[resurrected]

Please tell me you don't really keep an individual count.

It's his OCD driving him to do things a normal person wouldn't :idunno:

 

[Town Heretic]

Town and anna think the Golden Rule means that when someone takes a swipe at you you're justifed in taking a swipe back at them ten times as hard? :freak:

Nope. Rather, when she made a faux proposal of ending disagreements I said that if she didn't swing (if she followed the Golden Rule) she wouldn't be swung at. She then mischaracterized that just as you've tried to and for the same reason: you lack character.

Is that how bullies justify their behavior?

I wouldn't know, not being one. But I think you've definitively demonstrated who and what you are.

It's his OCD driving him to do things a normal person wouldn't :idunno:

Like posting nearly ninety times in one day (so far) or posting three times in a row to get the latest bit of frustrated nonsense out of your system? lain:

 

[Arthur Brain]

perhaps now you're beginning to understand why I call our challenged little friend "tardlyartie"


he's a bit slow

Geez, I'm always overwhelmed by your rapier wit SOD.

George Bernard Shaw would just kill for your material...

:bow:

 

[Arthur Brain]

Town and anna think the Golden Rule means that when someone takes a swipe at you you're justifed in taking a swipe back at them ten times as hard? :freak:

Is that how bullies justify their behavior?

Are you kidding? They put people in intensive care and hope they come to their senses later on.

C'mon SOD, get with the programme here!

:nono:

 

[Eeset]

Nope. Rather, when she made a faux proposal of ending disagreements I said that if she didn't swing (if she followed the Golden Rule) she wouldn't be swung at. She then mischaracterized that just as you've tried to and for the same reason: you lack character.

Dearest Town, it was not a faux proposal. It was sincere and you replied with your version of an alternative. Characterizing what I offered as faux is the very kind of behavior that perpetuates this atmosphere of animosity. If you had left the word faux out of your sentence I would not have responded. But you chose to interject it as a blatantly prejudicial adjective. Why?

 

[Rusha]

If you had left the word faux out of your sentence I would not have responded. But you chose to interject it as a blatantly prejudicial adjective. Why?

Because his preference is to be ... accurate.

 

[Town Heretic]

Dearest Town, it was not a faux proposal.

You're lying or you'd have said, "Great. Since I have no intention of offering personal insult I know you won't be offering any in return. Terrific." Or something to that effect.

It was sincere and you replied with your version of an alternative.

What alternative? You only proposed a cease fire. I answered that if you meant it you had nothing to worry about. You then showed your actual hand. Revise away, the truth/posts are preserved against the effort.

Characterizing what I offered as faux is the very kind of behavior that perpetuates this atmosphere of animosity.

No, characterizing my declaration the way you did and ending with no deal was, instead, a public revelation of the difference between your frequent declarations and what you're actually willing to do or refrain from.

If you had left the word faux out of your sentence I would not have responded. But you chose to interject it as a blatantly prejudicial adjective. Why?

Because you'd already rejected and mischaracterized. Now you're having problems with chronology.

 

[Eeset]

So now its the parsing gambit again?

 

[Town Heretic]

So now its the parsing gambit again?

In the sense that individual points, addressed as they arrive instead of at the end of a block quote could be considered parsing.

But this is just another of your tactics. You don't have the facts so you can't counter with them. You're left to attempt distraction. Boring, predictable and false.

 

[resurrected]

So now its the parsing gambit again?

Is he?


I suspect his ADD and his OCD go in cycles that are out of phase. When they both peak it causes an multiplicative effect wherein he is unable to focus on more than one sentence fragment at a time but driven to address a complete post without digesting it for meaning as a normal person would.

He reminds me of so many kids I've had in middle school and junior high classrooms. When they're properly diagnosed they can get the assists they need to achieve their maximum potential.

Until then they thrash around from one thing to the next, unable to concentrate long enough to complete any task adequately.

 

[Eeset]

But this is just another of your tactics. You don't have the facts so you can't counter with them. You're left to attempt distraction. Boring, predictable and false.

Yes you are becoming boring.

 

[resurrected]

Yes you are becoming boring.

I understand that his time is coming to an end :think:

 

[Town Heretic]

What anyone still awake and paying attention should notice is that Eeset kept doing exactly what I said, failing to support her claims with the clear facts/quotes and trying for distraction instead, with the help of what's his name (this time).

Sod, all I can say is that you're fortunate that I'm not willing to do with the unassailable truth what you attempt dishonestly. And the only thing coming to an end is tonight's dialogue.

Good luck on cracking a hundred tomorrow. lain:

 

[Rusha]

I understand that his time is coming to an end :think:

I was thinking the very same thing. I have no doubt that TH will leave TOL, and sneak back in under another ID ... maybe SOM (Same Old Minion). Then, after stalking members and making fun of handicapped children, he will most likely be banned several times like he was previously, talk about how wonderful TOL use to be and then slink off again.

I am thinking he will return as ... Renewed.

 

[resurrected]

and I'm thinking that you will probably reject Christ's sacrifice and continue spitting on the Cross to your dying day, after which you will face eternal torment in hell

 

[Rusha]

Eternal torment? I don't want to share eternity with you ... you are like the fly that just keeps buzzing around the picnic basket.