Do You Like Debates about the Evolution vs Creation Topic???

[SeaScience Film Labs]

You’re all invited to a debate surrounding the “AustraloMythecus” topic!!!

The channel is SFT ~ Standing For Truth, and it’s this next Monday: April 17th.

The Great Lucy Debate | Mark SeaScience vs. Grayson || Sufficient Evidence for "Australopithecus"?

Standing For Truth Ministries hosts "The Great Lucy Debate". Mark from SeaScience Film Labs debates Grayson from Based Theory on the question "Is There Suffi...

www.youtube.com

Save the date!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“𝐋𝐮𝐜𝐲’𝐬” 𝐇𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐒𝐚𝐜𝐫𝐮𝐦: 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐒𝐜𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐄𝐱𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐞 #𝟒 {𝟗~𝟏𝟒~𝟐𝟐}:

Subscribe to SFT (Standing For Truth), YEC (Young Earth Creation), and SeaScience Film Labs Channels; if You like Creationist Content, that slaps at the Evolution narratives:

https://youtube.com/@StandingForTruthMinistries

https://youtube.com/@YoungEarthCreation

https://youtube.com/@SeaScienceFilmLabs

Stay Strong, and God Bless!!!

 

[SeaScience Film Labs]

So! What do You guys think of the Sacrum included in the A.L. 288~1 Conglomeration???

Looks Human to Me…

 

[Sherman]

I think Lucy is a fraud. She's a conglomeration of parts. I watched a video years ago where they had to saw her hip and glue it back together to make it appear more human.

 

[SeaScience Film Labs]

I would like to see that video, I’ve heard tales of it… Some grinder and saw involved! Lol!

In his book "Lucy: The Beginnings of Humankind," Johanson describes how he and his team Excavated the fragments of Ilium from the side of the Eroding Hill, and reconstructed the Ilium included in the A.L. 288~1 conglomeration:

"We turned to the ilium, the large hip bone, which was badly fragmented. The back edge was missing, as was the upper portion near the hip joint. The remaining pieces, however, showed that the bone was curved, like a hockey stick. We excavated slowly, removing the bone bit by bit, and pieced the fragments together like a three-dimensional jigsaw puzzle. By the end of the day, we had reconstructed a large part of the ilium." (Johanson, l:t.b.h. 1981, p. 138)

Doesn’t really reinforce the belief that the Ilium is correctly reconstructed…

 

[SeaScience Film Labs]

Wow!!! That was a ton of fun!

Here’s the Document/Outline reviewed in this debate:

*PaleoAnthropological Phylogeny of the Hypothetical "Australopithecine:"
https://docs.google.com/document/d/102mnIIs45WO_KpyIL3xwXIZfLeeaX1Khlx44NTur1-Y

If You like to read along.