Durham charges Clinton campaign with illegal wiretaps on Trump

[User Name]

Blacks forced into slavery hundreds of years ago is no justification for unjustly persecuting innocent Americans today

Trump and company are not innocent. Africans forced into slavery hundreds of years ago were innocent. See the difference? No, I don't think you can.

God is the Judge of what is right, not Trump or Trump appointees.

It's literally the job of a judge to judge. Do you think we shouldn't have judges and that only God should judge?

 

[ok doser]

Blacks forced into slavery hundreds of years ago ...

... were first captured as slaves by other indigenous negro tribes in Africa and then traded to Arab slave traders

That part always gets left out

 

[marke]

Trump and company are not innocent. Africans forced into slavery hundreds of years ago were innocent. See the difference? No, I don't think you can.


It's literally the job of a judge to judge. Do you think we shouldn't have judges and that only God should judge?

Wrong. Trump may be guilty of a few things but not the major things democrats falsely accuse him of in order to destroy his influence. Hillary and Biden may be innocent of some things but not the major things their supporters are covering up in order to prevent them from losing their undeserved support.

 

[User Name]

Wrong. Trump may be guilty of a few things but not the major things democrats falsely accuse him of in order to destroy his influence. Hillary and Biden may be innocent of some things but not the major things their supporters are covering up in order to prevent them from losing their undeserved support.

Well, let's see...Trump stole top-secret documents. That alone would put the average person in prison for many years. The only reason Trump isn't in prison now is that he used to be a president, and historically we haven't held presidents accountable when they commit crimes.

But Trump is guilty of much more than just stealing top-secret documents. If the average person had done all of what Trump has done, he'd be in prison for a long time.

 

[marke]

Well, let's see...Trump stole top-secret documents. That alone would put the average person in prison for many years. The only reason Trump isn't in prison now is that he used to be a president, and historically we haven't held presidents accountable when they commit crimes.

But Trump is guilty of much more than just stealing top-secret documents. If the average person had done all of what Trump has done, he'd be in prison for a long time.

Trump declassified and kept documents he was allowed to keep, as confirmed by Amy Jackson's court ruling. Hillary destroyed records she was not allowed to destroy but was forgiven by Comey who had no legal authority to forgive her.

 

[User Name]

Trump declassified and kept documents he was allowed to keep, as confirmed by Amy Jackson's court ruling.

Total lie.

 

[marke]

Total lie.

Federal Court Ruling in 2012 Involving Bill 'Slick Willy' Clinton Set The Stage That Affirmed The Right of Presidents to Keep Documents [RULING] | On Monday, I did a story about why the FBI and the intelligence community are so afraid of the documents they seized during their raid on former President Donald Trump‘s Mar-a-Lago estate. The raid was a pretext to get the Spygate documents in Trump’s possession that would hold them culpable for the crimes they committed | The Tea Party's Front Page. | Slowly, our freedoms are being chipped away with, "We know better..." justification as its hammer and chisel. (ussanews.com)



“Under the statutory scheme established by the PRA, the decision to segregate personal materials from Presidential records is made by the President, during the President’s term and in his sole discretion,” Jackson wrote in her March 2012 decision, which was never appealed.

“Since the President is completely entrusted with the management and even the disposal of Presidential records during his time in office, it would be difficult for this Court to conclude that Congress intended that he would have less authority to do what he pleases with what he considers to be his personal records,” she added.

And guess what? No one ever appealed Jackson’s ruling.

From the ruling:

“The Court will grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) because plaintiff’s claim is not redressable. NARA does not have the authority to designate materials as “Presidential records,” NARA does not have the tapes in question, and NARA lacks any right, duty, or means to seize control of them. In other words, there has been no showing that a remedy would be available to redress plaintiff’s alleged injury even if the Court agreed with plaintiff’s characterization of the materials. Since plaintiff is completely unable to identify anything the Court could order the agency to do that the agency has any power, much less, a mandatory duty, to do, the case must be dismissed.”