Google censors TheologyOnLine!

Freak

New member
Originally posted by Dulcita
Ohhhhhh

Freak is a real published author? Where can I get an autographed copy?

Yes. I am. Check out amazon.com for yourself and get the book.
 

Zakath

Resident Atheist
Originally posted by Dulcita
Freak is a real published author?

In a manner of speaking.

Jay appears to be self-published. (Amazon lists his publisher as "unknown".) There are publishing houses that will print anything you want if you've got a few hundred dollars, up front of course... :rolleyes:
 

Freak

New member
Originally posted by Zakath


In a manner of speaking.

Jay appears to be self-published. (Amazon lists his publisher as "unknown".) There are publishing houses that will print anything you want if you've got a few hundred dollars, up front of course... :rolleyes:

You better check again. I do have a publisher based out of Fairfax, Va. I have had all kinds of problems with amazon.com here recently, so don't be surprised they get some of the info wrong.
 

CoCrucified

New member
Google likes four-letter, vile, obscence, pornographic words! Good is bad, and bad is good!

Whoops, I'm judging!!!

Alan
 

Zakath

Resident Atheist
Google likes what makes money and reduces their risk of being sued.

They're just a business.

There are already businesses that handle "morality" issues. They're called "churches".

I'd bet that Google has no desire to compete in that arena.
 

CoCrucified

New member
Originally posted by Zakath
Google likes what makes money and reduces their risk of being sued.

Of course anyone can sue for anything; however, I don't think just listing what's out there makes them liable for what is said.
 

Zakath

Resident Atheist
Originally posted by CoCrucified
Of course anyone can sue for anything; however, I don't think just listing what's out there makes them liable for what is said.
I agree, it's only that in our litigious society, even the non-involved parties sometimes have to spend money on legal defense.

It's aggravating, but the real world is sometimes that way. :rolleyes:
 

CoCrucified

New member
Originally posted by Zakath
I agree, it's only that in our litigious society, even the non-involved parties sometimes have to spend money on legal defense.

It's aggravating, but the real world is sometimes that way. :rolleyes:

I think we need "looser pays." That would stop a lot of this nonsense. If someone brings an unfounded lawsuit, they should pay both sides legal expenses.
 

Zakath

Resident Atheist
Originally posted by CoCrucified
I think we need "looser pays." That would stop a lot of this nonsense. If someone brings an unfounded lawsuit, they should pay both sides legal expenses.
Interesting idea. It would be particularly expensive if the state lost a suit - then the taxpayers get to pay.
 

CoCrucified

New member
Originally posted by Zakath
Interesting idea. It would be particularly expensive if the state lost a suit - then the taxpayers get to pay.

True. Maybe the politicians who mess up should pay instead!
 
Top