I'm Starting To Like This Trump Fellow

[commonsense]

Adult material should remain in the domain of adults.

I was pointing out idolater's foolishness in asserting that women are deliberately setting out to try to inflame his primal lusts. All he has to do is ignore such temptations. Maybe he needs to stop watching the Kardashian channel on tv. Perhaps he's weak and needs to pray for strength in the face of such evil temptations.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Adult material should remain in the domain of adults.

Porn of any kind should be outright banned for everyone.

 

[Idolater]

Adult material should remain in the domain of adults.

And if Kim Kardashian is dressing to provoke male reproductive arousal everywhere she goes in public, is that "adult material"?

I was pointing out idolater's foolishness in asserting that women are deliberately setting out to try to inflame his primal lusts.

Cite.

All he has to do is ignore such temptations.

That's all I have to do, that's my duty; what about the nine year old who sees Kim Kardashian presenting herself as a walking thirst trap in public? What ... what's HIS duty? the nine year old? What is that boy's responsibility when a temptress is in public provoking his nine year old reproductive arousal?

Maybe he needs to stop watching the Kardashian channel on tv. Perhaps he's weak and needs to pray for strength in the face of such evil temptations.

Are you going to say this to the nine year old boy?

 

[ok doser]

And if Kim Kardashian is dressing to provoke male reproductive arousal everywhere she goes in public, is that "adult material"?



Cite.



That's all I have to do, that's my duty; what about the nine year old who sees Kim Kardashian presenting herself as a walking thirst trap in public? What ... what's HIS duty? the nine year old? What is that boy's responsibility when a temptress is in public provoking his nine year old reproductive arousal?



Are you going to say this to the nine year old boy?

So I did a Google search on Kim Kardashian and when I was a 9-year-old boy I would have been absolutely disgusted with her appearance.
As I am now.
She's gross.

 

[commonsense]

Porn of any kind should be outright banned for everyone.

Define porn. It's a big category. Would you ban any nudity in movies, for example. Would the first amendment need to be annuled?

 

[commonsense]

So I did a Google search on Kim Kardashian and when I was a 9-year-old boy I would have been absolutely disgusted with her appearance.
As I am now.
She's gross.

Idolater seems to be fixated on the woman but I doubt I'd recognize her if I passed her on the street...

 

[commonsense]

That's all I have to do, that's my duty; what about the nine year old who sees Kim Kardashian presenting herself as a walking thirst trap in public? What ... what's HIS duty? the nine year old? What is that boy's responsibility when a temptress is in public provoking his nine year old reproductive arousal?

Well, that was a while ago but maybe when I was 11 or 12 a pretty woman, with nice hair, eyes, and symmetrical teeth could set my imagination going. Maybe a mandatory veil would have freed me of impure thoughts... If a burqua is a bridge too far, maybe a simple compulsory hijab would satisfy your patriarchal instincts.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Define porn.

explicit pictures, videos, or written material—including books, films, and online content—created to cause sexual arousal

Though, I should have been broader in what I said:

Trafficking in human sexuality, as a whole, should be banned.

It's a big category. Would you ban any nudity in movies, for example.

Yes.

Weinstein/Hollywood/MeToo Proves the Prudes Right | KGOV.com

kgov.com

Pornography: The nation-approved church-tolerated Destroyer | KGOV.com

kgov.com

Would the first amendment need to be annuled?

The fact that it is considered protected material under the first amendment should tell you just how flawed our constitution is.

You don't fix such an inherently flawed document. You replace it with something better.