NY Governor Bars State Travel to North Carolina Over Transgender Bathroom Ordinance..

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
NY Governor Bars State Travel to North Carolina Over Transgender Bathroom Ordinance Ban

New York's governor signed an executive order banning all "non-essential state travel" to North Carolina over the state's recent passage of a bill barring transgender bathroom ordinances.

Governor Andrew Cuomo signed the executive order Monday, which argued that "in a free society the equal rights of all citizens, including LGBT citizens, must be protected and cherished."

"All agencies, departments, boards, authorities and commissions [will] review all requests for state funded or state sponsored travel to the state of North Carolina so long as there is law in effect there that creates the grounds for discrimination against LGBT citizens," continued the order.

"New York State's ban on publicly funded travel shall take effect immediately and shall continue until such law is repealed."

In a statement, Governor Cuomo noted New York's history of support for gay rights and also that previously he had enacted a ban on state travel to Indiana during their debate over a state Religious Freedom Restoration Act law.

"From Stonewall to marriage equality, our state has been a beacon of hope and equality for the LGBT community, and we will not stand idly by as misguided legislation replicates the discrimination of the past," stated Cuomo.

"As long as there is a law in North Carolina that creates the grounds for discrimination against LGBT people, I am barring non-essential state travel to that state."

Earlier this month North Carolina's legislature passed House Bill 2, also known as the "Public Facilities Privacy & Security Act."

Passed overwhelmingly by both houses of the legislature and signed into law by Governor Pat McCrory, the bill effectively struck down a Charlotte city ordinance that among other things allowed for people to use the public restroom of their choice.

North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore stated that HB 2 was centered on the concerns many held about how privacy would be affected by ordinances like Charlotte's.

"The way the ordinance was written by City Council in Charlotte, it would have allowed a man to go into a bathroom, locker or any changing facility, where women are — even if he was a man," stated Moore.

"We were concerned. Obviously there is the security risk of a sexual predator, but there is the issue of privacy."

In response to HB 2's passage, the American Civil Liberties Union and a few LGBT groups filed a lawsuit against North Carolina.

"This lawsuit challenges a sweeping North Carolina law, House Bill 2 ('H.B. 2'), which bans transgender people from accessing restrooms and other facilities consistent with their gender identity and blocks local governments from protecting lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender ('LGBT') people against discrimination in a wide variety of settings," read the suit's introduction.

Regarding the bill, Governor McCrory recently released a "Myths vs. Facts" page on his website defending the merits of HB 2.

"Businesses are not limited by this bill. Private individuals, companies and universities can adopt new or keep existing nondiscrimination policies," stated the page.

"In fact, for the first time in state history, this law establishes a statewide anti-discrimination policy in North Carolina which is tougher than the federal government's. This also means that the law in North Carolina is not different when you go city to city."

In the defense of HB 2, McCrory's page also argued that contrary to what the critics say, the new law does not fully prohibit transgender individuals from using the bathroom of their new gender.

"This law simply says people must use the bathroom of the sex listed on their birth certificate. Anyone who has undergone a sex change can change their sex on their birth certificate," continued the page.

Ryan T. Anderson of the Heritage Foundation also defended HB 2, adding that it "continues the bathroom policy America has always had."

"Why do we have sex-specific bathrooms and locker rooms in the first place? It's because of biology, not because of 'gender identity'," wrote Anderson.

"Separate facilities reflect the fact that men and women have bodily differences; they are designed to protect privacy related to our bodies."

Wow, the dems are fast becoming totalitarian fascists. The arrogance here blows my mind- is this even legal? Thoughts?

PS see also for more info on this: http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...lina-Force-to-Rescind-Tranny-In-Bathroom-Bill
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
There's an awful lot of crying going on down here about the poor folks that can't afford gender reassignment surgery that will have to continue using the bathroom they don't belong in.

:rolleyes:

Calling evil good and good evil (allowing peverts to feel good in their sick heads vs the protection of women and children)

The fact that this all isnt a no brainier shows the sickness of society and the hypocrisy of liberalism (that they care about women)
 

genuineoriginal

New member

Ktoyou

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Yeah, seems an overreaction. And really, is NC supposed to care? :idunno:

There are so many high-tech ties with California now with North Carolina. The state seems to have moved into a forefront in technology. I do not know what they will do? Hold to their values, or give in the business> It seems strange to me business would be so concerned with this issue. It does not seem relevant to gay issues, not to me?

I just do not get it; gays siding with men who either want to be women, so they are not gay, or men who are not gay, but are fixated on women, what is the gay connection? Queer theory? What is that anyway?
 

The Horn

BANNED
Banned
Bravo to these governors ! They have the guts to stand up to homophobic bigotry . The notion that these anti-gay laws are to "protect" men from walking into women's bathrooms and rape them etc is idiotic . No such thing is happening or is going to . These reports are nothing but fear and hate mongering.
The ultimate goal of these unjust and unconstitutional laws is to gradually deprive gay people of more and more rights . They have nothing to do with ":religion freedom " and do NOT interfere with
anyone's rights except innocent gay people .
 

genuineoriginal

New member
Bravo to these governors ! They have the guts to stand up to homophobic bigotry . The notion that these anti-gay laws are to "protect" men from walking into women's bathrooms and rape them etc is idiotic . No such thing is happening or is going to . These reports are nothing but fear and hate mongering.
The ultimate goal of these unjust and unconstitutional laws is to gradually deprive gay people of more and more rights . They have nothing to do with ":religion freedom " and do NOT interfere with
anyone's rights except innocent gay people .
The purpose of pro-gay laws is to destroy the God Given rights of everyone that is not gay.
Claiming the right of crossdressers to enter the wrong gender bathroom is a violation of the privacy rights of the non-crossing people in those bathrooms.
Claiming the right to force bakers to bake gay wedding cakes is a violation of the religious rights of the bakers.

You are not advocating for these Satanic gay rights, you are just trying to take away God Given rights from the rest of us.
 

Quetzal

New member
Bravo to these governors ! They have the guts to stand up to homophobic bigotry . The notion that these anti-gay laws are to "protect" men from walking into women's bathrooms and rape them etc is idiotic . No such thing is happening or is going to . These reports are nothing but fear and hate mongering.
The ultimate goal of these unjust and unconstitutional laws is to gradually deprive gay people of more and more rights . They have nothing to do with ":religion freedom " and do NOT interfere with
anyone's rights except innocent gay people .
Correct. This is a page directly out of the politics playbook. That is, when something occurs that conflicts with personal moral alignment, the worst prediction/scenario is presented as the norm as a scare tactic. I expect nothing less since it has been happening for as long as I have been discussing politics.
 
Top