That is good to know, as I feel that all of the word of God applies to all men.I haven't ignored anything. I haven't suggested that anyone ignore anything.
I guess you could have perceived that as an accusation, but it wasn't meant that way.You knew that when you wrote this. You are therefore a liar.
It was more of a general observation, made to you.
Interesting take.So much for fools who claim sinless perfection.
Correct, but the country if Israel in not the "Kingdom" of God.That's true of those in the Body of Christ. It was not true of those in the Kingdom, who were of Israel, who were of the Circumcision.
It is the land of more unbelievers now.
Peter, James, Paul, John, Cornelius, Fortunatus, Asyncritus, etc. are now separate from the worldly definitions of "kingdom" thanks to the graceful mercy of God.
Does that mean I can't talk to Jewish folks about Jesus Christ because I am not Jewish?I didn't. God did. I'm simply reading what the bible says and applying it accordingly.
Galatians 2:6 As for those who were held in high esteem—whatever they were makes no difference to me; God does not show favoritism—they added nothing to my message. 7 On the contrary, they recognized that I had been entrusted with the task of preaching the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised. 8 For God, who was at work in Peter as an apostle to the circumcised, was also at work in me as an apostle to the Gentiles. 9 James, Peter and John, those esteemed as pillars, gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship when they recognized the grace given to me. They agreed that we should go to the Gentiles, and they to the circumcised.How much more explicit do you need it to be?
No, as all unbelievers are in the same "boat".
And any man in Christ can teach any other man on earth.
It seems you see separation in the Gal. 2's, verses while I see assignment.