Progressive Disenchantment Atonement

Right Divider

Body part
Abraham justified by faith vs. Abraham justified by works

- Romans 4:2–3: "If Abraham was justified by works… but he wasn't."
- James 2:21 (not Paul, but relevant): "Was not Abraham justified by works?"

But even within Paul:

- Philippians 3:6: Paul says he was "blameless" in righteousness under the law, which contradicts his claim that no one can be righteous by the law.
MW, you are a very dim bulb...

Did you know that it's possible to keep the law and still not be counted as righteous because of it?

I'm not saying that someone can live without breaking the law. But the law included the requirements for restoring oneself by confessing, making restitution, making sacrifices, etc. etc. etc.

Of course, there were some violations of the law that required the death penalty... like murder.

The difference between Paul and James is the difference of DISPENSATION. God's "house rules" change sometimes and that is something that you seem to be completely unaware of.
 

MWinther

Member
MW, you are a very dim bulb...

Did you know that it's possible to keep the law and still not be counted as righteous because of it?

I'm not saying that someone can live without breaking the law. But the law included the requirements for restoring oneself by confessing, making restitution, making sacrifices, etc. etc. etc.

Of course, there were some violations of the law that required the death penalty... like murder.

The difference between Paul and James is the difference of DISPENSATION. God's "house rules" change sometimes and that is something that you seem to be completely unaware of.
Dispensationalism is yet another nineteenth‑century heresy, born in the mind of John Nelson Darby. It insists on a rigid separation between Israel as an "earthly people" and the Church as a "heavenly people," but Scripture teaches no such thing. Paul speaks of one olive tree, not two (Romans 11). Ephesians 2-3 proclaims one new humanity, not parallel destinies. Galatians 3 eliminates ethnic distinctions within the Abrahamic promise.

Classical dispensationalism even claims that Israel is saved by obedience to the Law whereas the Church is saved by grace through faith. It fractures the unity of God's redemptive plan and creates multiple dispensations and multiple eschatological destinies. It reduces the Kingdom of God to a postponed political program, which contradicts Jesus' own teaching that the Kingdom is already present.

The system also breeds political fatalism. If the world must get worse before the rapture, then environmental care becomes pointless, social justice becomes secondary, and peace-making becomes irrelevant. Instead political conflicts become eschatological necessities, especially regarding modern Israel. War becomes a sign of prophetic fulfilment; peace efforts are sometimes resisted on theological grounds. The rapture expectation fosters escapism, a bunker mentality, and indifference to suffering.

Dispensationalism is the final stage of cosmological flattening. It removes divine presence from history, replaces sacramental participation with timelines, turns eschatology into a cosmic scheduling chart, and replaces pneumatology with prediction. It is the modern form of biblical fundamentalism, suppressing the symbolic, mythic, and metaphysical depth of Scripture. In truth, this is "religion as defense against the Holy Spirit." A dreadful heresy indeed.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Dispensationalism is yet another nineteenth‑century heresy, born in the mind of John Nelson Darby. It insists on a rigid separation between Israel as an "earthly people" and the Church as a "heavenly people," but Scripture teaches no such thing. Paul speaks of one olive tree, not two (Romans 11). Ephesians 2-3 proclaims one new humanity, not parallel destinies. Galatians 3 eliminates ethnic distinctions within the Abrahamic promise.

Classical dispensationalism even claims that Israel is saved by obedience to the Law whereas the Church is saved by grace through faith. It fractures the unity of God's redemptive plan and creates multiple dispensations and multiple eschatological destinies. It reduces the Kingdom of God to a postponed political program, which contradicts Jesus' own teaching that the Kingdom is already present.

The system also breeds political fatalism. If the world must get worse before the rapture, then environmental care becomes pointless, social justice becomes secondary, and peace-making becomes irrelevant. Instead political conflicts become eschatological necessities, especially regarding modern Israel. War becomes a sign of prophetic fulfilment; peace efforts are sometimes resisted on theological grounds. The rapture expectation fosters escapism, a bunker mentality, and indifference to suffering.

Dispensationalism is the final stage of cosmological flattening. It removes divine presence from history, replaces sacramental participation with timelines, turns eschatology into a cosmic scheduling chart, and replaces pneumatology with prediction. It is the modern form of biblical fundamentalism, suppressing the symbolic, mythic, and metaphysical depth of Scripture. In truth, this is "religion as defense against the Holy Spirit." A dreadful heresy indeed.

“Darby” is not an argument.

“Nineteenth century” is not an argument.

“Heresy” is not an argument.

“Political fatalism” is not an argument.

If dispensationalism is false, refute the distinctions from Scripture. Otherwise you are just denouncing the label because you cannot answer the verses.

Does Scripture itself distinguish Israel’s prophetic program from the mystery revealed through Paul?

Start with Romans 11, Ephesians 3, and Galatians 2.
 

VladtheDestroyer

Active member
the final stage of cosmological flattening...

500px-MadlHatterByTenniel.svg.png
 
Top