IMJerusha
New member
Double standard, huh?
Figures.
I like emotions. They're genuine.
I like to know what folks genuinely think.
Genuine?.....perhaps, but not to be trusted over the leadership of the Ruach, over God's commands or the Word of Yeshua.
Double standard, huh?
Figures.
I like emotions. They're genuine.
I like to know what folks genuinely think.
Yes.Is someone who threatens with violence qualified to call themselves Christian?
Yes you are.I am not discussing who is a better Christian,
Was calling 1PeaceMaker 1Piece a Christian thing to do?but whether talking about slapping an old lady around is Christian at all!
Yes.
Yes you are.
You want to know if John W's wording is Christian or not.
But don't want to consider whether your own words were Christian or not.
Was calling 1PeaceMaker 1Piece a Christian thing to do?
Why do you think we would disagree with this? You are knocking down straw dummies in order to declare victory. Enjoy your false victory.
Me either.
That too.But I interpret it as a the way you devalue what I say.
You and Nang need to do some memory exercises.I don't ever recall being harsh to you, only the things that you believe.
Was calling 1PeaceMaker 1Piece a Christian thing to do?
You and Nang need to do some memory exercises.
i don't know if folks are "coming at you" or simply responding to your assumptions and wrong interpretations. this site is not all lovey dovey when you preach false doctrine and wrong interpretations. slow down before you attack, then you won't be "attacked". it's funny when folks try to dispute God's Word given to Paul first, because those that do, eventually discover they have been wrong . . for so long. then they are bitter and angry, and never admit it, clinging to their prior understanding. we didn't write it, Paul did, after speaking with GOD. First -atrol: - BTW, it's ok, you are still somebody to me, even though i am no one to anyone
I can soak up the onslaught. It's never been a problem with me over the years here. But those who do it are carnal nonetheless.
Me either.
That too.
You and Nang need to do some memory exercises.
John W did not hurt me. But He hurts the name of Jesus Christ, and that is WORSE.
Don't you people get this at all?
I've already done that.You don't confess your sin either or show the least bit regret. How does that equate with repentance?
Nope.And it reflects first and foremost on the Ruach and Yeshua and then on you, not me.
It would be a lie.But it would speak a lot better for Yeshua.
Me too.I think He would be really angry about you being disingenuous
If I think you are an idiot and say so, it is not about the Spirit or Jesus.about the Ruach and Mashiach.
I don't.Don't throw your humanism on them.
I've already done that.
Nope.
It would be a lie.
How does that speak better for Jesus?
Me too.
If I think you are an idiot and say so, it is not about the Spirit or Jesus.
I don't.
Because the MADists I've spoken to do disagree with it. If you don't, that's fine with me.
Madists here understand things like "Christ living in you", as a positional state, not as something that is subject to the leading of the Spirit, and being yielded to God's will.
Booyah! Mid Acts Dispensationalism!
I would prefer MADists did not share their emotions at all. There is no reason for emoting angry thoughts and desires to hurt, when and if they think they are promoting their righteous cause.
I'm not shifting blame.Are you inventing excuses for all the bad behavior of the MAD crowd by shifting blame upon everyone else but them?
That would include you.That is what bad people do . . .
Bye.Booyah! Mid Acts Dispensationalism! 'Nuff said! Good night!
Paul's Gospel is the ONLY Message for today! God's Grace received
through our faith!
I haven't forgotten.Maybe you too?...or do you forget this:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4251374&postcount=1416
This is getting us nowhere! :yawn: A Dios!