I was simply heading you away from a bad crowd of mockers, strikers, and murderers...
You did not address my question, but I will address your reply.
Name-calling distracts...
1. Paul nowhere calls members of the Body of Christ "priests." Ambassadors, yes, himself and his associates...ambassadors bringing good news. But priests? No, and there's a good reason for that.
First Paul wrote his epistles...
Then the Evangellists wrote the first three Gospels...
Then the other epistles were written...
Then John wrote the fourth Gospel...
Then John wrote Revelation...
John wrote at the end of the first century...
Revelation speaks of the Christian Priesthood...
Rev 1:6
And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father;
to Him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.
So my question is: In what are we kings and priests unto God?
Or are you going to play dodge-ball and say that John was writing to the Jews? When the Jews were already destroyed as a people and scattered... And thereby fail to give John what you give Paul from many decades earlier when he encountered Christ?
Luke, the Beloved Physician and Evangellist, was a disciple of Paul...
Surely you will cede that anything found in his Gospel is not written just for the Jews?
2. A priest is a necessary mediator, by means of sacrifice or rite, between God and man when man cannot approach God on his own.
Do you seriously think that a man can approach God on his own? The simple truth is that man cannot approach God at all - God must approach man in order for there to be a relationship... No man can provide an approach to God for another man...
3. However, the one saving Sacrifice is forever done, never to be repeated nor "represented" as billions blasphemously believe.
Paul disagrees:
1Cor 11:26
For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup,
ye do shew the Lord's death till he come.
Matthew agrees with Paul:
Matthew 26:26
And as they were eating,
Jesus took bread,
and blessed it,
and brake it,
and gave it
to the disciples,
and said,
"Take, eat; this is my body."
And Paul agrees with Matthew:
1Cor 11:24
And when He had given thanks,
He brake it, and said,
"Take, eat: this is my body,
which is broken for you:
this be ye doing
in remembrance of me.
All one Gospel, you see...
This is how the faithful are instructed by Christ and by Paul to partake regularly and often of the eternal Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross...
4. Now think: what need could there possibly be for a priest during a dispensation where the Sacrifice is not only completed but all anyone need do to avail himself to that Sacrifice is to simply trust, without works of any kind, the good news that it was done for his sin...when the only human intermediary isn't an intermediary but just someone who shares the Word? Answer: in such a case, there is no need for priests and it's blasphemous to say there IS a need for priests.
The need is the instruction to do so by Christ, Matthew, and Paul...
To name but a few...
5. That is why use of
hiereus jumps from Acts straight to Hebrews, clean over Paul's epistles. There are no human priests today; no need for them. Anyone trusting in a "priest" is deceived. Anyone claiming to be a "priest" is an enemy of the Cross and a "minister of righteousness" (2 Cor 11:15).
The author of Acts is a disciple of Paul...
And Paul is the author of Hebrews...
And John of Revelation...
The Nation called Christian is a Royal Priesthood...
A peculiar nation indeed...
Now for my original question: where is Israel referred to as the Body of Christ?
That was my question too...
Arsenios