I am not a single issue person either. However, the sanctity of life is the most important issue to me, both in moral terms and because one of the few things that government is supposed to do is protect life.
The Republican Party since Reagan has consistently taken a pro-life stance, at least in terms of platforms and so forth. However, as you may have noticed, in reality, they have done little or nothing to end abortion or in any way protect the lives of those who cannot protect themselves. The Terri Schiavo case was a classic example of the Republican strategy. They made lots of noise supporting her, but in the end did nothing. Both the President and his brother could have saved Terri Schiavo's life, but elected not to. There is a reason for this. To take the kind of action that would have been needed in the Terri Schiavo case, or more generally, to take the action needed to end abortion, would mean alieniating the support of the "socially liberal" section of the Republican base. Politically, it is much safer and easier to keep pro-lifers on board through rhetoric rather than trough action.
In order to change this, and really, the only way this will change, is for the pro-life community to recognize what is going on and cease its support for the Republican Party. The most effective way to do this would be, especially in the next Presidential election, to shift support to the U.S. Constitution Party. It would not take a huge percentage of the pro-life vote shifting to cost the Republicans the next election. If this were to happen, if the U.S. Constitution Party were to get 3-5% of the vote and the Republicans lost, it would force the Republicans to do more than talk about pro-life in order to regain the support.
Enough for now, what do you think so far?