I've recently been posting on a more or less liberal forum.
Those guys are positively tyrannical.
1. I posted in a thread about abortion and indicated that pro-abortion persons are indoctrined/brainwashed secularists with absolutely no sense of virtue, beauty or goodness.
2. I asserted that it is the popular opinion of heterosexual men that having a romantic relationship (even more so a sexual relationship) with a transexual is disgusting, gay and revolting.
3. I asserted that any person who asserts that a transexual should retain the right not to disclose his or her status prior to sexual intercourse, even though most heterosexual men would not consent to such a thing, speaks like a rapist and consistently with a rapist's mindset.
4. The thread I posted in the politics forum about how social liberalism is ultimately practically reliant on atheism? That thread got locked for being too "bloggy."
Yeah.
That gets me warnings and bans and lockings of threads.
You know what, Knight?
TOL isn't biased enough. The secularists are willing to censor anyone who even insinuates that their adherents live bad lives.
The secularists are willing to censor anyone who even has the appearance of disagreeing with them. Yes, of course, it's perfectly alright for a secularist to accuse a religious person of a lack of education, of stupidity, of moral blindness, etc. It's even alright to use all sorts of vulgarities to demean him.
But say that a transexual "woman" is, in fact, a man?
Ban for you.
Knight, you haven't been biased enough.
There's no reasoning with secularists. :idunno:
To heck with social liberals. To heck with atheists. To heck with Muslims.
In my view, you should give them absolutely no ground.
But then, that's just my view. :idunno:
Those guys are positively tyrannical.
1. I posted in a thread about abortion and indicated that pro-abortion persons are indoctrined/brainwashed secularists with absolutely no sense of virtue, beauty or goodness.
2. I asserted that it is the popular opinion of heterosexual men that having a romantic relationship (even more so a sexual relationship) with a transexual is disgusting, gay and revolting.
3. I asserted that any person who asserts that a transexual should retain the right not to disclose his or her status prior to sexual intercourse, even though most heterosexual men would not consent to such a thing, speaks like a rapist and consistently with a rapist's mindset.
4. The thread I posted in the politics forum about how social liberalism is ultimately practically reliant on atheism? That thread got locked for being too "bloggy."
Yeah.
That gets me warnings and bans and lockings of threads.
You know what, Knight?
TOL isn't biased enough. The secularists are willing to censor anyone who even insinuates that their adherents live bad lives.
The secularists are willing to censor anyone who even has the appearance of disagreeing with them. Yes, of course, it's perfectly alright for a secularist to accuse a religious person of a lack of education, of stupidity, of moral blindness, etc. It's even alright to use all sorts of vulgarities to demean him.
But say that a transexual "woman" is, in fact, a man?
Ban for you.
Knight, you haven't been biased enough.
There's no reasoning with secularists. :idunno:
To heck with social liberals. To heck with atheists. To heck with Muslims.
In my view, you should give them absolutely no ground.
But then, that's just my view. :idunno:
