[ "like marbles on glass"

More like drool on the chin of a retard ]
Many people can fact-check you on the internet. Without receipts, you can only profitably declare things conspiracy theories and falsehoods, in live, in-person discussions. It's a poor tactic on the internet if you don't have receipts.
ofc.
But
@annabenedetti misses the big picture context oftentimes and doesn't just wade, but cannonballs into portions of discussions where there's nothing at stake anyway. She steps in it, but it's over nothing. It's like you wagered a ton of money ... to win a penny or something. If you win, you win all your wager back, plus one penny, and if you lose, you lose all your money. What kind of confidence would a rational person need before placing that bet? A rational person WOULD NOT make the bet in the first place, because the only appropriate size bet you should place to win a penny, is like, another penny, maybe five pennies. If you're feeling really lucky maybe 20 pennies, you would wager, to win a 21st penny. Maybe!
But she just chucks her whole reputation into the pot to try to win a penny? This is what I don't understand about her.
And I mean, the problem with the above is that then the act after the fact like, "Well that just never happened. I'm just going to continue to act like I know everything and that I am smarter than everybody conservative."
I don't get any of that.