Will Taiwan be destroyed by China while Biden remains silent?

ffreeloader

Well-known member
That's a nation? :noid:

Who?
Iran, Cuba, and a few African nations tied so closely by debt and the bnr initiative that they wouldn't survive economically without China's support. China is currently supporting a lot of countries economically. They pour cold hard cash into them. So they have been buying support the same way the US has for decades.
 

marke

Well-known member
Way to own your bloodlust. Then you advocate the killing of countless innocent women and children as collateral damage in your hell bombing, and you advocate sending more American sons and daughters off to be killed in yet another war.
Only morons fail to correctly blame the deaths of innocent women and children on the mass-murdering monsters the US is fighting to put down.
 

marke

Well-known member
Iran, Cuba, and a few African nations tied so closely by debt and the bnr initiative that they wouldn't survive economically without China's support. China is currently supporting a lot of countries economically. They pour cold hard cash into them. So they have been buying support the same way the US has for decades.
Many communist nations and rich politicians, sports figures, and democrats who, like the Biden family, owe the accumulation of much of their wealth to the communist Chinese.
 

Eric h

Well-known member
Only morons fail to correctly blame the deaths of innocent women and children on the mass-murdering monsters

With you on that one, now where shall we start? America has more than its fair share of mass murderers and rapists.

the US is fighting to put down.

The US seems more keen on sorting out other countries problems; rather than their own. Stands to reason, if you can't sort your own problems out; then you are going to have the same failures in other countries.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Way to own your bloodlust. Then you advocate the killing of countless innocent women and children as collateral damage in your hell bombing,

Who's advocating killing innocent women and children?

No one. Absolutely no one.

and you advocate sending more American sons and daughters off to be killed in yet another war.

Sons, yes. Daughters? No. I'm against having women in the military.

And yes, people die in wars. Although for the past 20 years or so, very few Americans and lots of Muslims have died in the middle east due to how technologically advanced we are compared to them...

Wasn't it an achievement that for the longest time, we had zero deaths in the middle east, while still fighting the terrorists there?
 
Last edited:

marke

Well-known member
With you on that one, now where shall we start? America has more than its fair share of mass murderers and rapists.



The US seems more keen on sorting out other countries problems; rather than their own. Stands to reason, if you can't sort your own problems out; then you are going to have the same failures in other countries.
America is beset with divisions between those who favor righteousness and those who favor wickedness. Just because America has to deal with those problems at home does not justify American refusal to fight for freedom and righteousness worldwide.
 

annabenedetti

Well-known member
Who's advocating killing innocent women and children?

No one. Absolutely no one.

marke is, with this comment:

Yes, I advocate bombing the murderous morons into hell.

Because you can't 'bomb the Chinese into hell' without killing many innocent women and children in the process.

Sons, yes. Daughters? No. I'm against having women in the military.

Regardless whether you're against it, women are in the military and they have been injured and they have been killed.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
marke is, with this comment:

No, he's not.

Because you can't 'bomb the Chinese into hell' without killing many innocent women and children in the process.

You sure about that?

Precision strikes are a thing, you know...

Not every bomb dropped has to be a nuke, and even tactical nukes can be used in the vicinity of friendlies with minimized risk.
 

annabenedetti

Well-known member
No, he's not.

You sure about that?

Precision strikes are a thing, you know...

Not every bomb dropped has to be a nuke, and even tactical nukes can be used in the vicinity of friendlies with minimized risk.

Civilian collateral casualties are inevitable in war. When he proposes to bomb another country to hell, who will also pay the price? Civilians.
 

marke

Well-known member
marke is, with this comment:



Because you can't 'bomb the Chinese into hell' without killing many innocent women and children in the process.



Regardless whether you're against it, women are in the military and they have been injured and they have been killed.
Obama bombed Libya and innocent women and children died. Obama set a new precedent at the time by going to war against another nation without congressional advice and consent. Nevertheless, innocent women and children have always been casualties of war and do not make wars either right or wrong based solely on that fact.
 
Top