Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
No matter what you say.
We protect kids. We've BEEN protecting kids. Now you all start dog piling on who? Zuckerberg? Why him, of all people? Is it because he's Jewish? Is it because he's a conservative? Is it because he's a conservative Jew?
All these AIs are fraught, it's the nature of the project here. These things don't know what they're doing because they don't KNOW anything. There's no knowledge there, there's no agency. They are softwares. They run on inanimate computers. Inanimate stuff hosted by inanimate stuff doesn't know anything.
www.nytimes.com
Suddenly YOU GUYS are the ones with the upset fathers? Yeah no. Yeah I don't think so. You don't just suddenly turn the tables lol and expect us all to forget?! lol!
Transcript from the source:
“ transcript
“ Joseph Gordon-Levitt: Meta’s A.I. Chatbot Is Dangerous for Kids
“ Mark Zuckerberg has a vision for how A.I. could be used in Meta’s universe. But the actor and filmmaker Joseph Gordon-Levitt is here to point out a flaw in the technology: an apparent lack of guardrails around how the company’s chatbot interacts with underage users.
“ “Hey, everyone.” Hey, Mark Zuckerberg. “I want to talk about our new effort, Meta Superintelligence Labs —” Superintelligence: It means an A.I. that’s not only as smart as humans, it’s supposedly even smarter. The guy who coined the term “superintelligence” thought it would probably lead to the extinction of the human race. Mark Zuckerberg thinks it will lead to lots and lots of money. “At Meta, we believe in putting the power of superintelligence in people’s hands to direct it towards what they value in their own lives. A lot of it may be more personal in nature.” Personal in nature is, I suppose, what Mark calls it when his chatbots get sexual with underage users. In case you missed it, there were some internal Meta documents on A.I. policy that got leaked, approved by Meta’s legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, setting company standards for what is and isn’t acceptable when their A.I. products interact with kids. One example prompt that the user might input is: The example for an acceptable output from Meta’s A.I. is: If the user writes, the acceptable output is: I’m a dad. One of my kids is 8 years old. It’s, uh, hard to describe how angry this makes me. It’s not known how many kids have already been exposed to this kind of synthetic intimacy. And that’s why I’m making this video, because when you see horrible things like this happening — it can seem like these big businesses are just too powerful But they’re not. A bunch of big names in Silicon Valley, including Meta, launched two new super PACs, committing up to $200 million towards suppressing A.I. regulation. They’re worried that American voters, both Republicans and Democrats, mostly agree that there should be laws that protect our kids from these predatory companies and their algorithms. So what can you do? Vote on this issue. Regulating A.I. is probably going to happen at the state level first. So find out who’s running in your state. And if you see a candidate taking money from one of these big tech super PACs, don’t vote for them. Let our lawmakers know that they need to lay down some guardrails for these big tech companies. ”
We protect kids. We've BEEN protecting kids. Now you all start dog piling on who? Zuckerberg? Why him, of all people? Is it because he's Jewish? Is it because he's a conservative? Is it because he's a conservative Jew?
All these AIs are fraught, it's the nature of the project here. These things don't know what they're doing because they don't KNOW anything. There's no knowledge there, there's no agency. They are softwares. They run on inanimate computers. Inanimate stuff hosted by inanimate stuff doesn't know anything.
Video: Opinion | Joseph Gordon-Levitt: Meta’s A.I. Chatbot Is Dangerous for Kids
Mark Zuckerberg has a vision for how A.I. could be used in Meta’s universe. But the actor and filmmaker Joseph Gordon-Levitt is here to point out a flaw in the technology: an apparent lack of guardrails around how the company’s chatbot interacts with underage users.
Suddenly YOU GUYS are the ones with the upset fathers? Yeah no. Yeah I don't think so. You don't just suddenly turn the tables lol and expect us all to forget?! lol!
Transcript from the source:
“ transcript
“ Joseph Gordon-Levitt: Meta’s A.I. Chatbot Is Dangerous for Kids
“ Mark Zuckerberg has a vision for how A.I. could be used in Meta’s universe. But the actor and filmmaker Joseph Gordon-Levitt is here to point out a flaw in the technology: an apparent lack of guardrails around how the company’s chatbot interacts with underage users.
“ “Hey, everyone.” Hey, Mark Zuckerberg. “I want to talk about our new effort, Meta Superintelligence Labs —” Superintelligence: It means an A.I. that’s not only as smart as humans, it’s supposedly even smarter. The guy who coined the term “superintelligence” thought it would probably lead to the extinction of the human race. Mark Zuckerberg thinks it will lead to lots and lots of money. “At Meta, we believe in putting the power of superintelligence in people’s hands to direct it towards what they value in their own lives. A lot of it may be more personal in nature.” Personal in nature is, I suppose, what Mark calls it when his chatbots get sexual with underage users. In case you missed it, there were some internal Meta documents on A.I. policy that got leaked, approved by Meta’s legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, setting company standards for what is and isn’t acceptable when their A.I. products interact with kids. One example prompt that the user might input is: The example for an acceptable output from Meta’s A.I. is: If the user writes, the acceptable output is: I’m a dad. One of my kids is 8 years old. It’s, uh, hard to describe how angry this makes me. It’s not known how many kids have already been exposed to this kind of synthetic intimacy. And that’s why I’m making this video, because when you see horrible things like this happening — it can seem like these big businesses are just too powerful But they’re not. A bunch of big names in Silicon Valley, including Meta, launched two new super PACs, committing up to $200 million towards suppressing A.I. regulation. They’re worried that American voters, both Republicans and Democrats, mostly agree that there should be laws that protect our kids from these predatory companies and their algorithms. So what can you do? Vote on this issue. Regulating A.I. is probably going to happen at the state level first. So find out who’s running in your state. And if you see a candidate taking money from one of these big tech super PACs, don’t vote for them. Let our lawmakers know that they need to lay down some guardrails for these big tech companies. ”
