Well, no, it doesn't.But many times "Science" retains theories that are highly questionable but must be kept to satisfy the prevailing paradigm. Even when that paradigm is full of problems... like the silly "big bang" theory.
Well, no, it doesn't.But many times "Science" retains theories that are highly questionable but must be kept to satisfy the prevailing paradigm. Even when that paradigm is full of problems... like the silly "big bang" theory.
Well... yes it does.Well, no, it doesn't.
Of course "Darwinism" isn't a theory, that's just some dumb trope you keep throwing about. Evolution, however, most certainly is and your risible nonsense about it being a cult kept alive by God hating anti science blah blah blah only serves to show just how clueless and dishonest you are where it comes to matters science. It hasn't "failed" any such thing and you've just embarrassed yourself once again on the score. No wonder you buy into conspiracy drivel.
Did someone claim that "science is one man's opinion"?
Answer: No. Nobody claimed any such thing.
"The game of science is, in principle, without end. He who decides one day that scientific statements do not call for any further test, and that they can be regarded as finally verified, retires from the game."
Which completely undermines your idea of an "established theory."
Oh. Really? So what you're saying is that the testing of theories never stops and when they fail they are discarded and that this is how "science works," but science is in no way, never, and completely not the process of throwing out ideas.
Gotcha.
Theories don't get established, remember?
Darwinism isn't a theory. It's a cult kept alive by God-hating, anti-science imbeciles and useful idiots, such as yourself.
It failed the law of entropy test at its inception.
Nope. Theories must always be falsifiable and not amendable. They should be as specific, rigid and improbable as they can be. Darwinism is none of those.
Well there's a platitude that you understand not at all. Explain: What is a theory "in general" and why can it not be subjected to the scientific process?
You live in Taiwan now?
Get out of town.
No, it doesn't. Your "prevailing paradigm" stuff is just drivel.Well... yes it does.
"Evolution" is a vague and unfalsifiable idea that does not even come close to qualifying as a theory.Of course "Darwinism" isn't a theory, that's just some dumb trope you keep throwing about. Evolution, however, most certainly is and your risible nonsense about it being a cult kept alive by God hating anti science blah blah blah only serves to show just how clueless and dishonest you are where it comes to matters science. It hasn't "failed" any such thing and you've just embarrassed yourself once again on the score. No wonder you buy into conspiracy drivel.
You speak of "science" as if it's a person.Of course science discards things that don't hold up to scrutiny, that's not the same as science being the process of throwing theories out.
Says the one that does not understand "science" in the first place.No, it doesn't. Your "prevailing paradigm" stuff is just drivel.
Cute, stupid but cute.Says the one that does not understand "science" in the first place.
It's cute that you find the truth cute.Cute, stupid but cute.
Of course "Darwinism" isn't a theory, that's just some dumb trope you keep throwing about. Evolution, however, most certainly is and your risible nonsense about it being a cult kept alive by God hating anti science blah blah blah only serves to show just how clueless and dishonest you are where it comes to matters science. It hasn't "failed" any such thing and you've just embarrassed yourself once again on the score. No wonder you buy into conspiracy drivel.
So science throws things out that don't hold up, but that's not the same as science being the process of discarding things.Of course science discards things that don't hold up to scrutiny, that's not the same as science being the process of throwing theories out.
Sure it does and is. Better luck next time."Evolution" is a vague and unfalsifiable idea that does not even come close to qualifying as a theory.
You speak of "science" as if it's a person.
Does and is too vague and unfalsifiable to qualify as a legitimate theory for sure.Sure it does and is.
I did fine this time.Better luck next time.
By all means, present this not vague theory of evolution.Sure it does and is. Better luck next time.
Not really but with you that's a rarity anyway.It's cute that you find the truth cute.
It is a legitimate theory for sure. You may not like it but so what?Does and is too vague and unfalsifiable to qualify as a legitimate theory for sure.
I did fine this time.
No, when you assert something as downright idiotic that the theory of evolution is a "cult" that's kept alive by anti science atheists blah blah blah then you are a bonafide moron. You remove yourself from anything resembling even the veneer of reasoned discourse with asininity like that and that's just on you. No wonder you were the subject of mockery in that thread you alluded to earlier, you more than deserved it.All of that drivel can be boiled down to: "I disagree," which can simply be assumed for any response you ever write.
Nothing you post adds anything of value to a discussion.
Darwinism failed the entropy test.
So science throws things out that don't hold up, but that's not the same as science being the process of discarding things.
Gotcha.
Gesundheit.Think of those sad emos that I give you mostly, as a picture of how pathetic you are.
No, when you assert something as downright idiotic that the theory of evolution is a "cult" that's kept alive by anti science atheists blah blah blah then you are a bonafide moron. You remove yourself from anything resembling even the veneer of reasoned discourse with asininity like that and that's just on you. No wonder you were the subject of mockery in that thread you alluded to earlier, you more than deserved it.
So science throws things out that don't hold up to scrutiny, but doesn't throw things out that don't hold up to the standards of logic, reason and evidence.Yes, science throws things out that don't hold up to scrutiny. If you can't understand how that doesn't equate to science being the process of throwing theories out then no wonder you struggle with simple terms and definitions...
Well, no you don't. Stating that evolution is a cult propped up by anti science atheists and whatnot can't be reasoned, it's simply a monumentally dumb thing to assert. That's on you. Not only is it dumb it's dishonest. The two main people on this forum who handed you your head on a plate on a regular basis regarding evolution and else are both believers. The theory of evolution is acknowledged on a global scale among people with a myriad beliefs, that's just fact. When you espouse the asinine as you have with this "cult" nonsense then you've removed yourself from reason which again, is solely on you. Evolution has failed no such thing.Reasons, remember? I justify my ideas with reasons. Evolution failed the entropy test. All we have from you is your insistence that I'm a "moron."
No reasoning. No logic. No content. All fluff. You're 100 percent spam.
You get asked to explain things, but you routinely ignore the invitations. It is clear that you are completely out of your depth and only remain afloat by inflating your water wings with hot air.
So science throws things out that don't hold up to scrutiny, but doesn't throw things out that don't hold up to the standards of logic, reason and evidence.
Gotcha.