MTG

marke

Well-known member
There was no good reason for MTG to vote against, just as there was no good reason for her to rant about Zelensky demanding that America send its sons and daughters to fight in Ukraine when he'd said nothing of the sort.
Not everyone shares your biased opinion, just as not everyone shared your Neville Chamberlain's opinion more than 80 years ago.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Not everyone shares your biased opinion, just as not everyone shared your Neville Chamberlain's opinion more than 80 years ago.
It's hardly opinion to state that MTG was completely wrong to opine that Zelensky was demanding that America send people's sons and daughters to fight in Ukraine. He wasn't - fact. There was no good reason to oppose the ruling as regards Turkey/Syria either. There was nothing controversial about it hence why everyone from Rep to Democrat supported it with the exception of her and another wingnut.
 

marke

Well-known member
Not everyone shares your biased opinion.

It's hardly opinion to state that MTG was completely wrong to opine that Zelensky was demanding that America send people's sons and daughters to fight in Ukraine. He wasn't - fact. There was no good reason to oppose the ruling as regards Turkey/Syria either. There was nothing controversial about it hence why everyone from Rep to Democrat supported it with the exception of her and another wingnut.
I do not blindly believe your biased opinion just because you appear to think everyone agrees with you.
 

marke

Well-known member
MTG was completely wrong to accuse Zelensky of what she did. That's not opinion, it's fact.
You might be right. You must be pretty wound up to pick apart statements made by politicians that may not be entirely correct or that may seem partly or even wholly wrong. There must be hundreds of thousands of somewhat flawed statements made across the US every year by politicians.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
You might be right. You must be pretty wound up to pick apart statements made by politicians that may not be entirely correct or that may seem partly or even wholly wrong. There must be hundreds of thousands of somewhat flawed statements made across the US every year by politicians.
It's fact. Zelensky said no such thing. However, there's a difference between flawed statements and outright lies and MTG doubled down on her claims that Zelensky said something he absolutely did not. At least Mike Lee had the good sense to delete his tweets when confronted with facts.

 

marke

Well-known member
It's fact. Zelensky said no such thing. However, there's a difference between flawed statements and outright lies and MTG doubled down on her claims that Zelensky said something he absolutely did not. At least Mike Lee had the good sense to delete his tweets when confronted with facts.

Trying to convince MTG that Zelensky did not mean what she thought he meant might be like trying to convince democrats Trump did not mean for protesters to commit violence at the Capitol when he urged them to remain law-abiding and peaceful.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Trying to convince MTG that Zelensky did not mean what she thought he meant might be like trying to convince democrats Trump did not mean for protesters to commit violence at the Capitol when he urged them to remain law-abiding and peaceful.
Well, no. MTG had no excuse and her rant was unsustainable. Not so with Trump and Jan 06. Be interesting to see what pans out with his hush money payment to Stormy Daniels with Cohen's upcoming testimony also.
 

marke

Well-known member
Well, no. MTG had no excuse and her rant was unsustainable. Not so with Trump and Jan 06. Be interesting to see what pans out with his hush money payment to Stormy Daniels with Cohen's upcoming testimony also.
You are wrong about MTG but you do prove that leftists have no tolerance whatever for diversities of opinions.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
You are wrong about MTG but you do prove that leftists have no tolerance whatever for diversities of opinions.
How am I wrong exactly? Do explain and while I consider her to be off the planet I still support her right to air her opinion. Explain that one as well.
 

marke

Well-known member
How am I wrong exactly? Do explain and while I consider her to be off the planet I still support her right to air her opinion. Explain that one as well.
She refused to reveal details about her rejection of the proposal. How can you say she is wrong?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
This kinda sums it up...


Another user offered their summation of her usual rhetoric.

"MTG: BLAH - BLAH - BLAH - I LIKE MAKING A LOT OF NOISE AND ACTING RIDICULOUS CAUSE I WANT TO BE ON TV," they wrote.

Ms Greene was mocked on Twitter for her claim, with one user, attorney Bryan Jeansonne, noting that "at least she said former president, that's some progress."
 

marke

Well-known member
This kinda sums it up...


Another user offered their summation of her usual rhetoric.

"MTG: BLAH - BLAH - BLAH - I LIKE MAKING A LOT OF NOISE AND ACTING RIDICULOUS CAUSE I WANT TO BE ON TV," they wrote.

Ms Greene was mocked on Twitter for her claim, with one user, attorney Bryan Jeansonne, noting that "at least she said former president, that's some progress."
Leftists mock those who continue to stand for truth and righteousness against the rising tide of darkness and depravity.
 
Top