Different Stuff

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
From X:
@trad_west_

This is a Guardian angel crying at the cradle of a child that he was supposed to guard.

It was designed by Timothy P. Schmalz and it's called "I Knew You in the Womb", its title recalls the words of Scripture:

“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you.” Jeremiah 1:5. (1/2)

HSVYcLuWsAAZBeg.pngHSVZBriW8AEhZka.jpg


|
@trad_west_

The work was created as a memorial to unborn children, Schmalz said he wanted to transform the absence into something visible.

Every human life is created by God, known by Him and worthy of love and protection from its conception.

That is what makes the empty cradle so heartbreaking.

It represents a child who will never be seen growing up.

Here, the message is simple: an empty cradle, a grieving angel and a life remembered before the world ever knew it.

HSVacLcXEAEyc9A.jpg

 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
From X:
@trad_west_

This is a Guardian angel crying at the cradle of a child that he was supposed to guard.

It was designed by Timothy P. Schmalz and it's called "I Knew You in the Womb", its title recalls the words of Scripture:

“Before I formed you in the womb I knew you.” Jeremiah 1:5. (1/2)

View attachment 16131View attachment 16132


|
@trad_west_

The work was created as a memorial to unborn children, Schmalz said he wanted to transform the absence into something visible.

Every human life is created by God, known by Him and worthy of love and protection from its conception.

That is what makes the empty cradle so heartbreaking.

It represents a child who will never be seen growing up.

Here, the message is simple: an empty cradle, a grieving angel and a life remembered before the world ever knew it.

View attachment 16133

Are the murdered unborn children not entitled to eternal life?
 

Idolater

Popetard
Yep.
I understand the sentiment behind the artwork, but the true tragedy is the decision by the mother to murder her child.
Where is her guardian angel, if you believe in such things?

What's not to believe in?

$$ Mt 18:10
Take heed that ye despise not one of these little ones; for I say unto you, That in heaven their angels do always behold the face of my Father which is in heaven.

If we have angels as children, why wouldn't we have them when we're all growed up?
 

Derf

Well-known member
Yep.
I understand the sentiment behind the artwork, but the true tragedy is the decision by the mother to murder her child.
Where is her guardian angel, if you believe in such things?
Perhaps because at some point we become fully responsible for our own actions?
But you do grant we have them as children anyway. Seemed like maybe Doser was questioning that is all.
Maybe it was those angels that were bringing a report to God about the atrocities being committed in Sodom, such that God had to personally go down and find out how bad it was.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Because they are without sin
Well, I'd agree that this point means they wouldn't be arbitrarily condemned to Hell as many Calvinists believe, but I'm not sure I'd go so far as to say that their permanent residency in Heaven is something that they are entitled to or even that such is guaranteed. That would make their heavily destiny just as arbitrary. It certainly goes beyond any biblical principle or statement to make such a claim.

It seems reasonable to expect that these children are raised to maturity and then are permitted to make their own choice as to whether they desire to remain. Of course, it seems intuitive that the overwhelming majority would choose to remain but that's not quite the same thing as saying that their eternal destiny is guaranteed. I would not have expected a third of the angels to rebel against God and yet that's just what happened and they weren't saddled with a fallen nature that they had inherited from their forefathers.

With that in view, I'd say that "entitled" over states their situation.
 
Top