Search results

No, it is just that I was alive at that time. The 'hippy' movement is the 'New Age' movement. The movement is fraught with sentiment first, truth later, as is the UB. Jesus told the Samaritan woman she needed to Worsip in truth AND Spirit, not just reject out of sentimentality. The UB...

Many are doing this collectively through broadcasts as well. Not sure if that meets your 'together' litmus though?

It wasn't a very good answer. He and other Unitarians just don't understand grammatical rules. I have to have a bit of grace, but certainly don't have a lot of patience for purposefully obtuse ignorance. It really bothers me when it is this incredibly willful. While not everybody does...

Sure there would be and without any kind of problem understanding He was standing there with them, at the time. Do you see that? No, it doesn't. It simply puts Himself in the context of those times but this part is speculative. What is clear, is that 'before' - 'Am.' It is...

Its mutual, but I'm not the usurper. You are, and without the where-with-all. Why do you guys all think platitudes are enough? Why even argue these points with Trinitarians? Isn't it because of YOUR contentious nature(s)? Isn't it? 🤔 I'm not the one with burden of proof. You are...

Are you actually capable of passing a Language Arts class? You are simply wrong. "Before" and "AM" mean something specific and MUST point to reason and a cause for that reason. In a word, you are 'wrong.' It is that clear. No, and I'm not sure you even know what 'projecting' means. I'm...

At the risk of being pedantic, EVERY bible scholar already knows what it means and has read Job many times. YOU, on the other hand, are taking a LONG way around to try to say something you likely know next to nothing about. I don't have to 'trick' rationalization out of someone. That is a...

Nope. This IS the Unitarian/Arian mistake. You guys do not seem to grasp context. There is a large difference between texts and you missed it. Fact. Skipping texts is proof-texting. You are proof-texting OUT OF CONTEXT! It IS the reason theologies aren't orthodox. You simply must be...

Changing the subject? Why does this matter? Anybody with a concordance or a bit of Bible education can either remember or look it up. A better question is 'Why do Arians/Unitarians need to so often do a 'set up' with rationalizations of men?' What is abundantly clear is simply this...

🤔

Louis Klopsch was the owner of a printing business and capable editor. The credentials behind the red letters are his ability as editor where grammar is taxed daily as well as his reliability upon scholars and theologians. While these theologians aren't named, Klopsch, as an editor had many...

This?

Disagree. He is standing if front of them. You are making a point of contest, it seems, for a theological construct. Simply read the scriptures. None of us needs to be so entwined with our theology ideas, that God cannot change them. Our sole focus is to be His and His faithfully. Simply...

Incorrect. There is no indication John 'switched' to commentary mode. That is an EXTRA-BIBLICAL construct.

Ouch! Hilltrot said if Jesus spoke of Himself in the third person, He was insane??? Lon doesn't often refer to himself in the third person, but if he ever did (like here) it is NOT the mark of insanity. It is a literary device with a purpose: "The Son of man did not come to be...

No, you just have to believe Philippians 2 No, It was written by Paul in Philippians. True, every disciple was put to death. John 20:28 Thomas said to Jesus, "You are the Lord and You are the God of me." YOU Unitarians have to explain to God one day why you ignored His scriptures. They...

Ah, so you weren't telling the truth in that other thread. You really have heard verses about Jesus being God "thought it not robbery to be equal." Are you actually an honest person, Hilltrot? Deal with scriptures like a truthful man instead of theological worming and squirming. Just a...

You, aren't accurate. There is a difference between that and 'projecting' 💫

It rather 'shows' and expresses that way. You cannot make a statement that 'before' such and something "am." Am is a PRESENT verb and Jesus is expressing it both as then (HE chose 'before') AND now. You simply are committing to constructs without thought for implication. It means 1) you...

I don't see how this is possible. Do you have an incredibly narrow reading on TOL? It appears blatantly untrue. There are many posts, let alone a 'single instance.' To me, it seems willfully ignorant and dishonest to say something on this scale.