Search results

http://creationsafaris.com/crev200706.htm#20070629a

The central problem: the emergence of biological evolution, the inherent paradoxes of the origin of replication and translation systems, and the limitations of the RNA world The origin(s) of replication and translation (hereinafter OORT) is qualitatively different from other problems in...

The Source of Novels On the Derivation of Ulysses from Don Quixote I IMAGINE THIS story being told to me by Jorge Luis Borges one evening in a Buenos Aires cafe. His voice dry and infinitely ironic, the aging, nearly blind literary master observes that "the Ulysses," mistakenly attributed to...

April 7, 2007 Science Daily — Scientists have confirmed the existence of protein in soft tissue recovered from the fossil bones of a 68 million-year-old Tyrannosaurus rex (T. rex) and a half-million-year-old mastodon.

From a Chicago Tribune interview with the president of the Field Museum about the new "Darwin" exhibit there: How many lies can one stuff into a single sentence like the above? Is evolution so weak that it must resort to lies to counter its opposition? Many people, like myself, have rejected...

I was criticized here recently for saying that Darwin believed that all life had descended from a single form. "Analogy would lead me one step further, namely, to the belief that all animals and plants have descended from some one prototype. But analogy may be a deceitful guide. Nevertheless...

Nature 447, 753 (14 June 2007) Published online 13 June 2007 Evolution and the brain (Editorial) With all deference to the sensibilities of religious people, the idea that man was created in the image of God can surely be put aside.

Might as well present my own theory on this, since most evolutionists here think I am "full of it" anyway (can't hurt much more than that). There are of course more than one theory floating around about this (and perhaps more than one factor is involved), but I have recently been concentrating...

I have decided to start a separate thread for this theological question, because on another thread I was called a "blasphemer" for using the title "Master Designer", instead of what I can only assume is the more "politically correct" title of "Creator". Hopefully those who know more about these...

Summary of the major findings which support YEC and a 6 day Creation. 1) Expansion of the universe - Big Bangers assume an initial ultra rapid expansion of the universe, which incidentally if continued at their assumed rate of expansion for only 0.000000000000000000000001 seconds more would...

The title of this thread uses the term "nonrandom DNA changes" instead of mutations, because the term "mutations" is a loaded word. The changes being observed in experiments that show lifeforms adapting rapidly to a changed environment happen too repeatedly and too rapidly to be due to errors...

It was pretty reasonable back around the time of the US Civil War to believe that life might have arisen naturally and changed and diversified by purely natural means to generate everything we see today. It might even have been marginally feasible back around WWII days before much if anything...

For those who continually state "Creationists do not understand evolution", please enlighten us dummies who do not agree that "all life has descended from a single hypothetical primitive protocell" (i.e. the general theory of evolution). What is the best evidence you have that this has occurred?

My idea that God expanded the universe on the 1st day of creation, including making all the stars and galaxies, seemed to suffer from the problem that all English translations say that the stars were made on the 4th day. I have been studying this passage intently to see if it might be possible...

Here is another example where the slavish adherence to an obsolete theory has hindered scientific progress in real microbiology of the cell. --------- April 24, 2007 'Junk' DNA Now Looks Like Powerful Regulator, Scientists Find Science Daily — Large swaths of garbled human DNA once dismissed...

I found this interesting: Questions from Young People March, 2007 The following questions are a composite from about ninety that two junior high school (7-8 grades) students from a local school’s science classes submitted to Barry for answering. Because there was no way he could respond to...

Since many here are of the opinion that anyone who doesn't believe in evolution must be an idiot, it would be interesting if people here would tell us whether they would stop going to a doctor if it was revealed that they didn't believe in evolution or that they were skeptical that it was true...

Interesting article which describes the way cells make proteins. Good movies too. http://pubs.acs.org/cen/coverstory/85/8508cover.html Real science at work!!

I hate to say "I told you so" (but I will anyway ;) ), but some time ago I reported here that the most favored theory of how the Moon originated received that status not because it was such a good theory but instead because all of the other theories had been shown to have very serious...

Many evolutionists have said on these forums that science is always open to the possibility that a particular theory is not true. In this thread I would like evolutionists to tell us whether they are open to the possibility that macroevolution is not true, and further, to tell us what the...