Search results

Examples of disinviting conversation (might help, might not but I pray over the difference):

Doesn't help. It actually is dismissive, disinviting. I've been sympathetic with Calvinists and because of that, there is not but graciousness from me in their theology, empathy (double-pred a different group, but I try). Why don't Open Theists practice longsuffering, patience, and...

In a sense, yes, but if we are wrong, we need to adjust accordingly, being always moldable by God and not hardened if challenged. It means, I believe, always a humble state of dependence on God as well as inherent to our walk with Him. His does, if you will. If we get so stringent He...

You know, pretty much only Open Theists say this? Know what that means? It means your theology is driving everything in your lives. Look just above. JR put laughter, and you before that, but you guys are purposefully (purposefully) brain washing yourselves for a pet doctrine. Thank you...

No, not too high. It is well researched, well written.

It doesn't make them not real. 10 minutes is pretty solid, I see the change on the clock which accurately measures duration. I have to have 3:19 and 3:29 to mark ten minutes. What you are describing, and I applaud, is timelessness, at least as the likely alternative. Insomuch as any...

I tried. It was painful. I've given good faith on many other of your videos. I rarely use it, see it very often from Open Theists. "You idiot!" or something like. "That's ridiculous" or dare I say " Philosophical nonsense," from his own lips. In most schools of debate it is...

. .________. ._________> <-----------------------------> The first is an easy concept. One point in history. It isn't durative. It is a point. A beginning or an end with no action. We conceive of it, yet it has no duration. The end of a book, last period. It simply means 'end'...

I don't buy the premise (and this particular video is unwatchable). It is wholly Open conjecture that I don't see supported by the scripture. It literally (word for word) discussed the vast difference between God and man and addresses exactly the difference that arrogant man thought he was...

Honestly? You do a better job than this guy. When one says, for instance "Philosophical nonsense," they are the ones with fingers in ears. While I don't mind Open Theism persay, those who become arrogant are unwatchable. He claims of himself he is well-known. How well known 'can' he...

🆙 I don't take it that way, and of course my abandoning RC connections is wholesale for all kinds of important reasons.

He touches all around Isaiah but for these specific verses, that are again juxtaposition of a difference between God and man specifically. I might argue a few of his other observations, didn't see anything in particular, but nothing really in the way of these specific scriptures Credo posted...

Realize on these, I was trying to argue more of Credo's intent. Isaiah 46:10 is fine the way OT and conversely I see it.

Copy/paste from post #1345

Is there any very clear omniscient passage? Perhaps the Isaiah 46 passage is the clearest: Isaiah 46:21-24 - Present your case,” says the Lord. “Bring forth your strong reasons,” says the King of Jacob. “Let them bring forth and show us what will happen; Let them show the former things, what...

Jesus? :noway:

Love. It endures all things. Thank you. Not necessary. This is a mountain, but not 'the' mountain. Will keep in prayer. God has used you in my life. I pray that in some small way, I can pay it back. Agreement notwithstanding. In Him -Lon

Note that it is through 'the man that executeth my counsel.' Thus part of 'knowing' it through us as well. It doesn't have to be EDF necessarily,, but it is more than Open Theism intimates. Sure, but remember the verbs are passive, not active. It means all actions, not just his own. You...

As an addition, entertain you aren't honest with yourself. You often contradict, may inadvertently lie to yourself, even. Something to ponder and forgive the intimacy of such a post, but it is evident to several on TOL. Try to let your yes be yes. It may (likely) play into your...

This ever, when you are emotionally connected to your topic. Good? Can be, but give God that passion! We don't have to agree, Paul and Barnabas did not, both godly men. This is somewhat huge, likely 'two separate ways' but neither of our efforts wasted. To this day, I've no idea...