Search results

  1. A

    Adam and or Eve had all the viruses.

    then what's the point? You come here with claims that are very specific (even if the "proof" is, well a little more than vague) but you have pictures of the equipment needed to create these wonderful stones, stories about how the alchemical process is ancient and found everywhere but you have...
  2. A

    Adam and or Eve had all the viruses.

    SoT, do you or do you not have a red stone? Certainly, with all your specific research and chemical equipment examples, you must have one. If not, why not?
  3. A

    Adam and or Eve had all the viruses.

    SoT, who cares what the Bible says, Your explanation is sooo detailed, you must have carried out the process yourself, so have you any of those red stones to sell? And, I repeat, you are the bestest poster here, you provide more entertainment than anyone else. But please, please, my wife needs...
  4. A

    Adam and or Eve had all the viruses.

    This guy is the bestest. I'll stick with science. But now I am concerned with where the Stone might be? Can we expect a Monty Python movie---the Search for the Stone? a sequel to their Holy Grail movie?? See if you can sell it to Marvel. Sorry, but I just cannot take you seriously and am...
  5. A

    Adam and or Eve had all the viruses.

    Ahh, magic. Harry Potter stuff. Sorry, but you lost me. I have enough trouble accepting a literal interpretation of the Bible as most of those her accept. But Kabbalah like mysticism which you seem to put forth is sillier. You are dismissed.
  6. A

    Adam and or Eve had all the viruses.

    SoT, I have neither the time nor the energy to go back through your specific discussion with Clete or others, but in post 112 you mentioned "the same hidden secret". Is there just one hidden secret? And if so, what is it? Bring it to light, thanks
  7. A

    Adam and or Eve had all the viruses.

    Diseases were for man's sake? Let's just suggest that to every family who lost a child to cancer. What a special interpretation of the Bible you have. And just to get this straight we now suffer from disease because someone disobeyed several thousand years ago. Bonkers, truly bonkers on every level.
  8. A

    Would Trump be America's 1st Illiterate President?

    Ah, 7, still angry all the time. Take your meds.
  9. A

    Would Trump be America's 1st Illiterate President?

    Oh, I'm sure Trump can read. He just doesn't like to. He likes things to be simple and easy to understand. Problem is that lots of things are not necessarily simple---the effect of tariffs on the prices of goods for example.
  10. A

    Trump Harris debate

    Ah, a rumor on the internet. Must be true. I keep hearing rumors that Melania is just waiting for him to lose, go to the pokey and divorce him.
  11. A

    Trump Harris debate

    It was certainly intended to suggest to Republican women and any women on the fence that a Trump administration will be "keep 'em barefoot and pregnant". It was not intended to sway Trump's base, that Kool-Aid has already been drunk. I think it was intended to sway those undecideds who were...
  12. A

    Kabul Fell Yesterday, Where Is The President

    The deal was made by donny, not Joe.
  13. A

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    has anyone every provided an answer to what happens to all the heat (h bomb equivalents) brown has suggested? where does that go?
  14. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    actually she is not very good at reading or typing. lacks a certain amount of brain power and manual dexterity. she can run really really fast though and can her ability to smell things is really really much better than mine. different evolutionary branches on that tree of life
  15. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    alate who you referenced seemed to have a pretty good handle on niology. but please provide evidence for your claim that darwinists have been on earth for 4.5 billion years. it pains me to say this to someone who has a command of english, but you are simply brutally ignorant. i would do better...
  16. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    well first question is to define “human”. all genus Homo or just H sapiens? but you know the answer—evolution. which you already accept in terms of “branching out” after creation and or the flood
  17. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    actually even taxonomy based on morphology can depend on appearances. some taxonomists are lumpers and some splitters
  18. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    Today genetics is also used
  19. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    no
  20. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    taxonomy is the classification of things according to their characteristics. i think we are speaking of the classification of living things according to their characteristics. i’m not sure what you mean by defining it as “affirming propositions”
Top