Search results

7 it appears you have some issues with reading comprehension. please direct me to the specific language in the article that suggest the earliest hominids appeared fully formed with arms, legs, etc. Are you suggesting the scientists who did the work suggested that? Here’s a thought—-google them...

False on several levels. 1. the Smithsonian article did not say that, The Smithsonian article was discussing hominids. It made no reference to single celled organisms.. If you can show me where in the article it suggested otherwise, feel free to do so.Or are you suggesting that the science...

7 is simply wrong. H. sapiens appeared roughly 300,000 years ago.

Why do you even bother to comment on something like this article when you have. apparently, no acceptance of basic science?

What else would you expect from a right wing, covid conspiracist. lover of old Latin mass.

Traitor donny was beloved by the nyc tabloids because he sold newspapers. Likely started when DoJ sued Donny and daddy tor racial discrimination in renting apartments. ahh that pesky weaponized Nixon justice department

Since my screen name is in honor of my granddaughter who died suddenly at 8.5 months, I don't think you deserve any response to anything from here on. But have a nice life, it is the only one you get and when it is over---that's it.

awww

try to read the book. why should i do all thw work for you? does your mommy do your homework for you?

i suspect the book might be too difficult for you, has lots of genus and species names that are hard to pronounce. clearly you have zero science background or interest

Yes, the book (an the evidence it presents) concludes that fish are the ancestors of humans. Since you are clearly way beyond me in the ability to write short pithy posts just get on with your life. In the meantime, if you bothered to investigate who knows what might happen. However, the book...

the issue at the moment is not whether the claims put forth in the book are true. the issue is why you do not believe i read the book? other than that you clearly have too much time on your hands in order to write an 8 paragraph response to my suggestion that you read the book (not just the...

why would you not believe me?

not only did i read it in hard cover but listened to it on audible. it seems however you have not read it or intend to do so. again, unless you are willing to read it why bother to criticize it, since you do not know what it says

not only did i read it in hard cover but listened to it on audible. it seems however you have not read it or intend to do so. again, unless you are willing to read it why bother to criticize it, since you do not know what it says?

I did read it some time ago. Shuben is a scientist. The book is in part about the discovery of Taktaalik and makes many references to the similarities in certain structures in fish to humans. You should read it and report back. The original post here suggested that birds came from fish, not just...

Read Neil Shuben's "Your Inner Fish"

ah, 5th grade name calling

that is what you focus on? amazing