Search results

Good works aren't prohibited under grace, Derf. Doing good is still a perfectly desirable thing. It just isn't a prerequisite of getting saved. It's good enough to get you saved, Derf. It's good enough to get you saved. No one is suggesting that you shouldn't do rightly! No one is suggesting...

This is your interpretation but it is not what the text of scripture teaches. James and his followers were all "zealous for the law" and if it isn't works of the law then just what sort of works would you suggest that he is talking about? Acts 22:8 On the following day Paul went in with us to...

How is it possible for that effect to work from more than one perspective?

Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

Liar.

The argument that has been presented proves that it isn't 100%, it's zero! It cannot have happened. It did not happen! Given then that we are here and that life cannot have happened by accident, the conclusion then is that life was created. Here we are!

That is not what I'm doing at all. I'm using a computer to perform billions of random actions in an attempt to assemble a particular sequence of 26 letters by random chance. A feat far and away simpler than assembling an RNA molecule by random chance which you believe happened! Are you really...

I always imagined him hanging there dead until the rope or the tree broke and then he laid there, dead and bloated until he burst open.

I take you off of ignore long enough to read one single post! ONE POST!! I have proven to you that Paul cannot have been the author of Hebrews more than once with evidence that you have NEVER even attempted to counter. You are simply dishonest. You couldn't care less about the truth. I can't...

Well, Manuel seems to have not stuck around. I was hoping the the above would prompt at least a question or two but it didn't and so I thought I'd just take the next logical step myself, ask the question that my post above should have prompted and then answer it. Perhaps Manuel will come back...

It's annoying that anyone would think he would do that. What Elon is doing is all about common sense. It isn't just cutting for the sake of cutting stuff. Although, in this bloated heap of crap we call a government, he could almost just do exactly that and be just fine.

Anyone remember Strong Bad?

I agree that such record keeping is a terrific idea. History is always valuable to record and to remember. That alone makes this a good idea. Is the idea to require the king to make this record himself or could he delegate the doing of it to someone who's job it is to record all the official...

Always good to have new folks around!

Yes, you are wrong but not in the way implied by the way you asked the question. It's clear that your exposure to Mid-Acts Dispensationalism is somewhat superficial. You've come to the right place to fix that! It would be basically impossible for Paul to have stated it any more bluntly...

TRUE! I love it! It's just one sentence but what makes your post so awesome is that it is an actual argument that is directly responsive to the point being discussed! It is just pathetically ridiculous how rare that is to see from anyone who doesn't already agree with most everything I say. Keep...

I am not encoding anything and I'm not the one who came up with 102 nucleotides. The fact is that the simplest known self-replicating molecule happens to be an RNA molecule that has 102 nucleotides. The information that encoded in it has to do with both it's function and it's self-replicating...

Because it is language based and it takes what it takes to encode the needed information. It isn't impossible that some amount of truncation could occur without effecting function but it isn't likely because it is already so small and because the nucleotide sequence isn't the only factor...

I recommend running it with just 1 or 2 processes. If that works, move to to three and so on until you stop seeing an increase in tries per second. If running just one or two processes still crashes, I don't have a clue what the issue might be.

Fixed it! The code shown in post #21 (and now also in post #1) is what I'm pretty sure is now the final version. Next time either of you talks to Will Duffy, you should mention it and see if he wants to reactivate the link in that article with this modern code. It'll take 80 years for anyone to...