Search results

Of course he was more than just dust after he was created. That's why he had to "return" to dust--because he wasn't currently dust when God said that. But if there's any part of him that doesn't "return" to dust, then God isn't being accurate, is He? And His threat is not true, if we just enter...

God didn't tell Adam how long the disintegration back into dust would take. Abel's blood had a chance, I presume metaphorically, to cry out to God from the ground before it was fully disintegrated. Are you suggesting that the "separation" idea of death can be applied to our molecular structure...

What about the dust aspect of death? Dust you are, and to dust you shall return (Gen 3:19). If Adam returned to what he was before, and he didn’t exist before he was created, then how can we say he merely “separated” from his body. That means he (the part that is the essential him) did NOT...

This from the guy who wrote this only a few weeks ago:

Of course the god of this world—Satan—doesn’t want the gospel to get out. That’s because it has the power to save, and being a murderer, Satan doesn’t want anyone to be saved and escape death. But you’re saying, along with our friend @beloved57, that those who believe the gospel are already...

If you used scripture, then why does someone else need to articulate your points?

At least, I think I am. But I don't think "I AM" I know you capitalized "I AM", but God thinks, therefore I am: I AM, therefore I am. But because God can think us into existence, we can think: I am, therefore I think. I can't think myself into existence, but I can imagine, and then create...

I'm evidence for God. You're evidence for God. The universe is evidence for God. Everything in the universe is evidence for God. There is nothing that exists that is not evidence for God, since He made everything in heaven and earth. Saying there is no evidence for God is a way of saying I don't...

I definitely prefer substance with my waffles.

Amen, Brother! Hence I’ve given my approval of your post just like a sheep.

Wait for it…

Sore LUser Name has to dredge up a hit piece on the auditors from May 10th, because he can see the truth in recent news.

Or polluted by Robertson’s view, Brain?

As good as I want to be, usually.

I don’t know all the details, but much of it is taught in literature and social institutions, like high school and college. And “subservience” is not what Robertson is talking about, so we’ll call that a straw man.

I’m not sure which of your questions you don’t think I’ve answered. I thought I was pretty straightforward. Ask again what I missed. But I think you are saying in this post that teenagers should never listen to anyone that doesn’t agree with you on this subject. Even if your way is wrong...

You haven't actually said anything. He tasted death for every man, and he is bringing many sons into glory. Those statements don't conflict, since not everyone will be brought into glory, even though he tasted death for every man. You really need to put aside you preconceptions and maybe listen...

If it's only in reference to some evil intention you've cooked up for him, then there's no real beef, except in your head. It still isn't a problem. If you could answer my question, however, it gets you outside of your own standard of morality for a moment, and might allow you to think clearly...

Would you have trouble if he said the young men needed to be pliant, malleable, and molded into the "ideal husband"?

Yep. Not a sudden morphing, but hard to reverse after 20. Nope, because they are only so to you because you have a humanistic mindset that won’t allow God’s standards to dictate anything to you.