Search results

:nono: and don't have to. Pay attention the gospel words (or don't) "But THESE are written that you may have life..." Which means closed canon both exegetically and by other scriptures given. The NT is a closed canon. A Mormon or exmormon will have a terrible time with that. :nono...

Er, no. 1) the Spirit, Himself (not me or you) indwells a believer and 2) the biblical message is so consistent that ANY extra revelation is both extemporaneous and contradictory. As an exMormon, that will be a foreign idea to you, but it is essential that you understand where your faith...

To keep from derailing another thread. No serious scholar or academic questions the historicity of the person of Jesus Christ. The video is wrong, there are about 10 other sources that mention the Lord Jesus Christ. Even the Quran speaks of His actual existence. Zeke, you are paying...

"I've been a Democrat all my life," Trump says as he drops out of the presidential race, "[Did] you people really believe me?" *Note: There is an obviousness to the article on a few levels...

Except they got it exactly backwards, here is what the correction is today: Embarrassingly, this study has been cited by liberals who will now have to live with themselves and in this case, the three-fingers pointing back exponentially are all liberal so the fourth finger has to become an...

A little long with scriptures, but they are how we live as Spiritually indwelled beings. I've given commentary to tie them together for my reasoning and defense of our Christian view and understanding. I pray this post and the thread serve well for difficult days of needed discussion and...

Lot of scriptures on this. I'll start: Mat 5:38 "You have heard that it was said, 'An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.' Mat 5:39 But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. Mat 5:40 And if anyone would...

Prove them. You can't. There is more to man's experience than just religion, science, and philosophy. This is dismally simpleton, like much of the UB. Next: Values? Truth, Goodness, and beauty? Again, imho, too simplistic. I'd never settle for another's explanation and Sadler...

:nono: Absolutely not. This is your prior poor Mormon understanding rearing its ugly head. You know you reject the Christian message of salvation completely. You know it and yet make as if to lie about it. Mormons ever have done so. It is a cognitive dissonance at best which is...

2 Peter 2:12

:nono: They were sent by Bill Sadler. The BoM was sent by Joseph Smith. :nono: No they do not! They teach that you are 'evolving' and that what you need now may be completely different from what you need in the future. The UB teaches relative truth, therefore, there can be no absolute...

Anything that is anti-scriptural and/or anti-Christ is blasphemy. In the end it is about tolerance. When offense is purposefully given, offense is purposefully taken. Your postings are a purposeful offense to Christians and it is against TOL rules to purposefully do so. In point of fact...

Dispensationalism, AND according to them, before Divine enablement of the Holy Spirit. So the scriptures are called 'scriptures' for a reason and to your own detriment. You are practicing excusing behavior, pick-n-choose behavior. As soon as you became the arbiter of what God could say...

:yawn: All in your made-up head. No, it is the UB assertion. You quote it as if it were infallible :noway: :dizzy: More Bill Sadler propaganda. No, this is just repackaged cult so Eastern mysticists can attempt to co-exist with Christians. :Plain: There is no other reason to bring...

Explanatory for MAD and posterity: I'm not anti-MAD here and will explain: Explanatory for MAD and posterity: I'm not anti-MAD here and will explain: I am being careful with MAD here btw. I'm not disparaging them, just telling PJ/FL that it isn't viable for him to see Paul as using a...

Uhmm, trying to burn down stainless steel with a lighter isn't 'attacking' persay because of how feeble it is BUT the thing that drives you to it is not innocent. Bull, or you'd take this to some other website (and there are plenty) when asked by Knight, mods, and TOL members to do so. This is...

Are you ignorant or a liar? Caino has often come against the gospel of Jesus Christ and especially against His work on the Cross. You too, skate around those terms. John 6 is nowhere compatible with your Urantia-propositions. As a reminder, they aren't given as the words of God either...

Blasphemy against God: John 3:16 and against His servant 2 Peter 3:16 "Accursed" isn't a 'spell' either :Plain: It is a condition of God against that one. The God of the universe is against you.

Contrasts: Gal 1:7 not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. Gal 1:8 But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. Gal 1:9 As we have...

We've no idea. Hippies called Vets 'baby-killers.' They were right BUT they never bothered to understand. You too, assume innocent as well as no other viable answer. Like I said, I don't like to go into it, but research it if you've a mind. They weren't innocent women and sadly...