Search results

But that's not the real reason--That's merely their justification for wickedness, so they don't have to repent. If you disagree with them, please say so. It will do you good.

So what indeed. That's about all your post is worth. Why did you post in the first place?

1) You should. 2) That's odd. I was quite certain that you actually replied to the post where I linked to a refutation of your posted link (you have to click on it, as the image isn't of your post, but the URL is): https://theologyonline.com/threads/end-of-roe-vs-wade.56698/post-1852199 You...

But you didn't offer any refutation of it. If there is an immoral position that you reference, I recommend you at least explain that you don't agree with it, else we will think you are immoral.

Keep listening to your conscience, but test what your conscience is telling you by comparing to a trustworthy source of ethics, of which there are few. Consciences can become seared from too much ignoring. The Bible is the most trustworthy of all ethical standards, because it was inspired by...

You need better sources. Here's one: https://www.jewishlifeleague.org/pro-life-judaism/is-judaism-a-pro-life-religion

This might lead to a superficial agreement that falls apart when foundational truths are discussed. But it's a start. That's more than Jesus was willing to accept. Luke 6:46 (KJV) And why call ye me, Lord, Lord, and do not the things which I say? Because it is the only way to avoid just...

When I mentioned ivermectin to my lefty sister when my mother had covid, she sneeringly referred to it as horse medicine. I should try asking about this one.

As long as you don't recognize them as persons, it's ok to murder them, right?

You mean toxic feminists, right?

Me too. But as we've discussed elsewhere, the definition of "rape" appears to be up in the air.

Kind of like saying masculinity depends on the ability of men to rape women.

And you get to define "honest"? So you're willing to accept everything every atheist has ever said about morality? Disbelieving doesn't make it false, either. Second hand would be ok? With multiple witnesses?

And between two times of judgment.

So they show that the "day" of judgment can last 1000 years. 😄 But besides that, there are two times of judgment given in Rev 20, one at the beginning and one at the end of the 1000 years. Revelation 20:4-6 (KJV) 4 And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them...

Matthew 10:15 (KJV) Verily I say unto you, It shall be more tolerable for the land of Sodom and Gomorrha in the day of judgment, than for that city. Hebrews 6:2 (KJV) Of the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, and of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment. 2 Peter 2:9...

Why then is the judgment normally talked about as occurring when Christ returns?

How soon?

Right. A and L were "far off" from Hades where RM was.