Search results

And one of them "at least" is a member of ICE. "Funny" how having criminal convictions in America are practically a bonus these days as regards employment in the upper echelons...

Hmm, well, setting aside that this current administration and it's commander in chief are a global laughing stock (not that it's funny) then what in blazes has happened to the security forces lately?

I wasn't. Renee Good was murdered and Ross should face trial for his crime along with plenty others and not just within ICE. Yeah, it probably didn't originate with Stripe but wow, it was peurile and boring then and it is now. Some people are homosexual, get over it already.

There was no evasion, I answered you from the get go, that a person with sufficient development should not be allowed to get away with a crime. The rest should follow as obvious, unless you need things spoon fed and on a silver platter? Heck, I'll do that in future if ya want - join the dots so...

Patel would be better off not doing his job and swigging cans in a locker room...and as for Bondi's replacement - Todd blanche, one can only hope the lunacy of the current clown show of an administation ends ASAP and the after effects don't last decades....

Oh wow, have you become "Stripe" all of a sudden? Otherwise, that little mantra got old loooong ago....

Just as well I wasn't then.

"JudgeRightly" advocates that children, or indeed, any person post birth (unless he wants to add a bizarre caveat here) can be executed for a "capitol crime". So, that includes children as young as five, younger even, to face the "electric chair" so to speak. Does that sit right with you? Is it...

Jonathan Ross should be tried for murder.

So what if he is?

So, JR's contention that the death penalty should be applied to all ages would solve any of that how? Do you think that the DP should be applied to five year old's and younger?

Heck, there's nothing to avoid! I've said multiple times that a person (with the caveat of being old enough to be held accountable for a crime) should not be allowed to get away with it. Why do you suppose I'm saying that? Gordon Bennet, obviously it would set a bad precedent, that shouldn't...

In that case, don't post any more talking heads from any social media outlet cos that ain't dialogue. But here ya go, as you're clearly not invested enough to read the article and these are only snippets - otherwise you'd probably ding me for a post of extreme length... Regarding recruitment...

Well yeah, neither of us are radical right wingers, Trump apologists, conspiracy cranks or advocates for executing kids so yup, we're just a pair of loonies!

No, I answered your question directly regarding "should a person be allowed to get away with a crime", not whether criminals should be allowed to get away with them. You've had it fully - several times. No, they should not - provided they're old enough and possess sufficient mental acuity to be...

Yeah, he's the MAGA loony in that pic. Thankfully, the sane world are a bit more savvy than the wingnut brigade....

Then "ding" me JR. Not jumping through your hoops so meh.

Apart from the fact that I answered you several times. Never once have I stated that a criminal should get away with a crime as you accused me of. Care to retract? Ironically enough, Clete did answer you on the score where it comes to five year olds, something I did at the time this particular...

You'll find out if you read it. I provided the evidence so read it or don't. I know it's in depth and a long read so up to you. It's not just you where it comes to social media, I'm a bit more savvy than to buy into preconceived talking heads to confirm bias is all.

Oh, he does. We had this "merry go round" a few years ago. He thinks children as young as five can be executed for "capital crimes".