Search results

Given the amount of stuff you dredge up, I don't go out of my way to click on your loopy links and oh so boooring diatribes. Never heard of him. If he's guilty of some sort of abuse (the legal variety, not your "ideal") then prosecute the guy. The lies and harmful practices of "conversion...

Exactly, see the kind of "character" you're dealing with now? aCW knows fine well that homosexuality would never be made a crime in the West but it won't stop him from devoting years and years to his pet project as it's not really his aim. It's to be seen as a "moral crusader" on the internet...

People haven't "gone out of their way" to let you know that they aren't gay, they may have told you often enough after you've consistently lied and invented lurid scenario after scenario about straight posters being homosexual and involved in "trysts" however. It's only a disconnect to cranks...

Simple enough question for anyone to answer who cares about civil liberty. Homosexuals aren't committing a crime and they shouldn't be persecuted by either the state or religious cranks. See how easy it is to give a straight answer to a question? I don't know what you were recently banned for...

But "Uncle" aCW. The first passage admonishes your actions as deliberately lying about and misrepresenting people doesn't fulfil love but goes against it. You've recently been banned off a Christian forum for such dishonesty and behaviour. How do you justify that?

What, really?! :duh: Tell ya what, here's a scenario in turn: Dear "Uncle" aCW. Why is it that you are so uncommonly fixated on homosexuality and in particular gay men? It's highly irregular for a straight man to be so obsessed on the subject to devote seven years to a blog which...

Oh, beware Kit, now you're getting the "Uncle" scenarios! :shocked:

Bollocks. You knew fine well what you were doing and you can lie to yourself as much as you want but it ain't gonna fly with anyone else. You tried to paint Alwight as a homosexual and what you really need to do is just get to grips with your own homosexuality and quit projecting your self...

It's a shame you weren't about when Alwight was here because aCW tried the exact same stuff and was disassembled like jenga blocks. You won't get any reason with aCW and even he might be regretting his asinine comments in regards to Alwight but stick around Kit. There's plenty crap conversations...

RIP Alwight. A much more honest and regarded person than you aCW: http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?117970-To-Alwight-Alan-Best-Wishes!!

Just a heads up Kit. When aCW mentions 'Alwight', he was a well regarded poster here who was straight. aCW is once again using lying sleaze when he mentions anal cancer and he's deliberately tried to paint him as homosexual. Given the garbage he's flung in your direction I'm sure it'll come as...

Not indulging your fevered and appallingly written scenarios is just that. When did Alwight admit to having "anal cancer"? You are pathetic. If it was bowel cancer then it's a common form and nothing to do with the likes of what you're implying. For the benefit of Kit, Alwight was a straight...

Dude, you've constantly used misinformation, hyperbole and crackpot exaggeration since you started this bore fest about seven years ago and your obsession with gay men is pathological. You need to get to grips with your own sexuality because "therapy centers" won't help you and it's time to stop...

Absolutely, he wasn't intimidated into telling the truth as you know. He willingly retracted his findings and as you also know he went further than that and made it clear that he didn't want his former research used by crank outfits like NARTH etc. If you want to continue to be a clown and...

Dude, he wasn't threatened or coerced into retracting his findings. He was an honest man who not only retracted his research but expressly requested that organizations like NARTH and Dr James Dobson refrain from using them, which of course the crackpots didn't and it's not the first time that...

He didn't "yield" to anything and this is just the sort of garbage I'd expect from crank sites like "A4T"... He retracted his findings because he realized he was in error and that therapy simply doesn't work. Unlike far right religious crackpots he's simply echoing what the legitimate...

He's not lying in either. Back in 2004 he had an erroneous view that with reflection, honesty and insight he subsequently changed. Good for him for doing so.

Um, no they didn't. Spitzer retracted and apologized of his own volition as is obvious if you'd viewed the video. He was insistent that people like Dr James Dobson were being dishonest and unethical to continue using his earlier findings as "evidence" and that organisations such as "PFOX" should...

Yes, by making up lurid innuendo and lies about people. :Plain:

He retracted it and apologized for it. The fact that certain quack outfits didn't respect his wishes to not use his study is irrelevant. He makes this explicitly clear in his own words: gIifMxPcRnI