gcthomas
New member
rude kids who assault them, sure :thumb:
We arrest and prosecute people who assault police.
You seem to want them executed without trial at the roadside.
:idunno:
rude kids who assault them, sure :thumb:
We arrest and prosecute people who assault police.
And you've encouraged bad apple cops
Wrong. I have clearly stated that *bad apple cops* should be confronted in court. Unlike you, I do not encourage civilians to initiate or participate in a roadside brawl.
Yes, you said that. But you are taking the side they'd want you to take in this, regardless.
I would expect baby pj to think I was serious, but you?
This "modern day police state" is a figment of the liberal imagination. Plain and simple.
So, you weren't serious?
And your plain and simply wrong. So we can not talk past each other, what is your definition of a police state?
Yes, you said that. But you are taking the side they'd want you to take in this, regardless.
Pfffftttt ... no, I am taking the side of *common sense*. Unlike you. Simply showing a license and registration is an act of nonaggression that would have most likely ended in kid receiving a lecture or warning ticket.
But the kid did not start the aggression; his behaviour was polite passive non-compliance...
but for non-violent non-compliance to result in seven (!) bullets
which is a violation of the law and justification for the officer to arrest him
i'm fascinated why you continually misrepresent the situation
do you think you're fooling anybody?
why do you keep ignoring the fact that the kid assaulted the officer?
(which, btw, really doesn't meet the definition of "non-violent non-compliance")
... the cop kicked the phone
then tasered him to force compliance.
The taser was not used in defence.
Even if the assault was justified by the passive non-compliance, it was certainly the cop who escalated the stop to violence.
the officer, in the hospital, after the shooting:
![]()
the kid resisted arrest, the officer tried to use his non-lethal weapon, the taser, it failed, the kid got on top of him whaling on his face, so the officer shot him
the story gcthomas is trying to sell is: the kid refused, politely, to produce his license and registration, so the officer executed him at roadside
on the other hand, if I'm frost and I shoot the kid dead for reasons that might not be appropriate and realize I'm in a world of trouble, and I realize my body cam's off and I'm out of the line of sight of my dashcam, if I'm a quick thinker I slam my face into the pavement a couple times real quick and claim he attacked me