Russel Brand has six million subscribers. That’s a whole lot of folks who are listening to Kennedy correct their misunderstandings about the origins of the pandemic, or at least expose them to another view. That’s progress.
“The weird thing about the pandemic was this constant involvement by the CIA, the intelligence agencies, and the military. When Operation Warp Speed made its presentation to the FDA committee called VRBPAC [and] turned over the organizational charts that were classified at the time, it shocked everybody because it wasn’t [being run by] HHS, CDC, NIH, FDA, or a public health agency. It was [run by] the NSA, a spy agency that was at the top and led Operation Warp Speed.
The vaccines were [not developed] by Moderna and Pfizer. They were developed by NIH, NIH owns the patents, [at least 50%]. Nor were [the vaccines even] manufactured by Pfizer, or by Moderna. They were manufactured by military contractors. And basically, Pfizer and Moderna were paid to put their stamps on those vaccines as if they came from the pharmaceutical industry. But that’s not what they were doing.
This was a military project from the beginning…
I uncovered… 20 different [government-led] simulations on coronavirus and pandemic simulations. That started in 2001. The first one was right before the anthrax attacks. And every year, the CIA sponsored them all. The last one was Event 201 in October 2019. And one of the participants was Avril Haines, the former Deputy Director of the CIA, who has been managing coverups her entire life. She did Guantanamo Bay and others. She is now the Director of National Intelligence which makes her the highest ranking officer at the NSA — which managed the pandemic.
So you have a spy who is convening these pandemic simulations and in each of these simulations going back 20 years, they’re not simulating a public health response. They’re not [brainstorming] things like, how do we stockpile Vitamin D? How do we get people outdoors, losing weight, doing exercise? How do we develop an information grid for all the 15 million front line doctors all over the world, so that we can get them information [about what] works and what doesn’t work. None of that happened. We had an incredible opportunity to manage a pandemic in a way that was intelligent and sensitive and devastating to the disease, but we didn’t do any of those things.
[Instead, it] was all about, how do you use a pandemic to clamp down [with] censorship? How you use [a pandemic] to force lockdowns?
By the way, with lockdowns, every pandemic preparedness document that had been adopted by any [of the] major public health agencies, whether it was CDC, WHO, European Health Agency, National Health Services of Britain. All of them said you don’t do lockdowns, you quarantine the sick, you protect the vulnerable. And you let everybody else go back to work because a lockdown actually amplifies the impact of the disease. If you isolate people, it makes them more vulnerable, it breaks down their immune system. You lock them indoors, it’s going to spread the respiratory virus.
And so all the things they’re [practicing] are about clamping down totalitarian controls.”
What if the clinical trials measured the wrong antibody? And what if the jabs are changing people's immune response to produce the wrong antibodies? Then what? New studies.www.coffeeandcovid.com
In terms of neutralizing capability, IgG3 is up to FIFTY TIMES more effective at neutralizing virus proteins than is IgG4. If IgG3 is a well-armed SWAT team, then IgG4 is Mall Cop.
In study subjects with breakthrough infections, it was even worse: On average, subjects who had a breakthrough infection after their booster shots showed 42.45% IgG4 — almost half. Remember — IgG4 is not even seen in the normal immune response to covid in unjabbed people.
Critically, all the vaccinated subjects’ IgG3 levels fell to ZERO (0%) after their third jab in the study. That’s not good.
In other words, the researchers found as time goes on, vaccinated people relied more on IgG4 — the allergy antibody — than virus fighter IgG3, whereas it was the exact opposite for unjabbed people. Something seems to be suppressing IgG3 in jabbed people, and the body appears to be compensating by recruiting the available but imperfect IgG4 type.
That phenomenon could help explain the expert-baffling chart we saw last week from the Cleveland Clinic study, which found that jabbing increased the risk of reinfection.
Snake venom! The researchers discovered neurotoxic, snake venom-like genetic characteristics within the spike protein. It confirms Dr. Brian Ardis’ concerns, who faced ridicule and exclusion from medical freedom conferences after he discussed the similarities between the spike protein and snake venom on the Stew Peters show.
The SARS-CoV-2 glycoprotein contains a neurotoxin-like region that has sequence similarities to the rabies virus and the HIV glycoproteins, as well as to snake neurotoxins, which interact with nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtypes via this region.
My goodness. What they’re saying is, the safe and effective jabs could make people’s immune systems respond with “tolerance” — ignoring the spike protein altogether, since the body can’t get rid of it, its own cells keep making the damned things — and tolerance of spike could lead to:
[R]ecent investigations have found abnormally high levels of IgG4 in people who were administered two or more injections of the mRNA vaccines… [E]merging evidence suggests that the reported increase in IgG4 levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines may not be a protective mechanism; rather, it constitutes an immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases, and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals.
Haha, the CDC’s statements were “contradicted” by UK data. Good one. They were really saying the CDC is useless. The researchers also suggested the IgG4 class shift as a potential explanation for the sky-high Western excess mortality rates — which is the first time I’ve seen any mainstream source suggest there might be a link between the jabs and the deaths.
It is worth noting that there are conflicting pieces of information about the level of protection offered by these vaccines. Although the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in the United States has stated that throughout the pandemic, mortality rates have been higher in the unvaccinated than in the vaccinated, the data in the United Kingdom contradict the CDC’s findings. Specifically, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) in the United Kingdom has reported that from April to mid-November 2021, deaths in unvaccinated people were higher in comparison with vaccinated people who had received a second vaccine dose. However, from the end of November 2021 to December 2022, this situation reverted: deaths were higher in vaccinated people who received a third vaccine dose compared with the unvaccinated.