31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

way 2 go

Well-known member

.https://x.com/redpilldispensr/status/1972218233433296939

 
Last edited:

way 2 go

Well-known member

Avajs

Active member
I suspect he also developed cancer after he was born.
Wow, hard to beat that logic, but misses the point---can you show a causal relationship between a vaccine, breakfast, being born and cancer? And to follow up on the Dilbert creator, last I read he may not be terminal (although to follow the thought process of Right Divider, we are all terminal). His prostate cancer may respond to hormone therapy. If so, good for him, and another win for science--just as vaccine's are another win for science. For a good summary of the advances in science leading to better cancer therapies read The Emperor of All Maladies.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Wow, hard to beat that logic, but misses the point---can you show a causal relationship between a vaccine, breakfast, being born and cancer? And to follow up on the Dilbert creator, last I read he may not be terminal (although to follow the thought process of Right Divider, we are all terminal). His prostate cancer may respond to hormone therapy. If so, good for him, and another win for science--just as vaccine's are another win for science. For a good summary of the advances in science leading to better cancer therapies read The Emperor of All Maladies.

According to a nee_tweet he posted a month or two ago, it will only work for a year or two. It buys him time, but it's not a cure.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Here's a science-based counter to the questionable source at X:


Good thing I posted more than one, then.

Here's another, for good measure:

 
Top