-
This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
Big bang... a big NO!
- Thread starter Right Divider
- Start date
Right Divider
Body part
I'm surprised that there were no comments on this video.
SeaScience Film Labs
New member
A total 𝐌𝐲𝐭𝐡...
SeaScience Film Labs
New member
Rebel for truth
Member
Well the Bible says there are heaven s' which implies there are multiple universes. Man can only see so far who knows what's on the other side of what they can't see since space is infinite.
Right Divider
Body part
No, it does not imply that. There are multiple things called heaven in the Bible. Even the surface of the earth is called Heaven at one time.
Gen 1:8 (AKJV/PCE)
(1:8) And God called the firmament Heaven. And the evening and the morning were the second day.
What leads you to believe that "space is infinite"?
How does that imply that there are multiple universes?
There is exactly zero evidence that whatever is past what we can see is appreciably different than that which we can see. There is an equal amount of evidence that "space" is infinite. That is, if by "space" you mean the physical universe.
(Actual space does not exist except as an idea. Space is simply the distance between objects. Objects exist but the expanse between those objects is not itself another object. In a perfect vacuum, nothing exists.)
So this isn't going to be a comment about the Big Bang and so forgive the rabbit trail but I just wanted to make an observation about the way Answers in Genesis (AiG) does their videos and see if anyone agrees with me or if I'm just all wet.
Am I wrong or is there just no comparison in watchability between the two videos that have been presented in this thread (Posts 1 & 4)? The AiG video presents information that is good but the style belongs in the 1980s & 90s! It reminds me of stuff my church would put on from time to time when I was in high school, three decades ago. Zero energy from a sort of stuffy looking guy in khakis and a tie who speaks with a sort of flat voice and does so for what feel like forever at pace my dead grandmother could keep up with. Somebody get that dude a Red Bull or something!
The video presented by Dr. Craig, on the other hand is simply excellent. It presents the information in a manner that is both intellectually and visually compelling and it does so in a concise manner that is paced correctly, neither speeding through the material nor plodding through unnecessary details and, as a result, it just feels like something that is aimed at a modern audience.
Don't get me wrong, here. I like the folks over at AiG and think that they're doing some excellent work. Indeed, Dr. Craig has some disastrously horrible errors in much of his material; far more so than AiG on its worst day. It's just that I feel like someone needs to tell AiG that we're fully two decades into the 21st century. They need to hire some younger people to present their material who can do so with some energy and in a style that doesn't feel like its aimed at senior citizens.
Clete
I'm always entertained by the style and quality of Genesis Apologetics
.
The true CORE of the problem is that Science no longer expects honesty from the less educated
this is why evolution is rampant and unchecked
EVOLUTION ITSELF - is an evolving theory that never stops growing
promoters of the theory of evolution think upon their theory as a dinosaur that never stops growing........
last minute edit, sorry
but to explain what i mean is that the world of " so called science " are very selective about what they want society to regard as truth
while the so called science world allows society to slip into a bottomless pit on other matters
science has a selective morality
The true CORE of the problem is that Science no longer expects honesty from the less educated
this is why evolution is rampant and unchecked
EVOLUTION ITSELF - is an evolving theory that never stops growing
promoters of the theory of evolution think upon their theory as a dinosaur that never stops growing........
last minute edit, sorry
but to explain what i mean is that the world of " so called science " are very selective about what they want society to regard as truth
while the so called science world allows society to slip into a bottomless pit on other matters
science has a selective morality
Last edited:
The Electric Universe theory is far more compelling than a Big Bang.
Another video, addressing the revisionism of proponents of the Big Bang.
Planetary formation doesn't work with the Big Bang.
Also mentioned near the end of the video, a solar system with planets formed... and it's only measured as thousands of years old...
Also mentioned near the end of the video, a solar system with planets formed... and it's only measured as thousands of years old...
I've been watching these videos for years and years.
There's two main problems....
1. They associate themselves with people who put forward really wacky "theories" having to do with ancient history that are almost on the level of Ancient Alien theory - not quite as bad as that, but close.
This serves to undermine their own credibility.
2. They literally see electricity behind every bush. Electricity starts sounding like it's the explanation for every single mystery in all of science.
The Sun, Moon, stars, galaxies, nebula and everything else in the sky - both it's formation and function - electrical.
The craters on not just the moon but nearly every crater everywhere on every planet moon, comet or asteroid - electrical.
Weather - all weather on every planet - electrical.
Geology - ALL geology on every planet, moon, comet or asteroid - electrical.
It's just all electricity, everywhere, all the time!
This also serves to undermine their credibility.
There's two main problems....
1. They associate themselves with people who put forward really wacky "theories" having to do with ancient history that are almost on the level of Ancient Alien theory - not quite as bad as that, but close.
This serves to undermine their own credibility.
2. They literally see electricity behind every bush. Electricity starts sounding like it's the explanation for every single mystery in all of science.
The Sun, Moon, stars, galaxies, nebula and everything else in the sky - both it's formation and function - electrical.
The craters on not just the moon but nearly every crater everywhere on every planet moon, comet or asteroid - electrical.
Weather - all weather on every planet - electrical.
Geology - ALL geology on every planet, moon, comet or asteroid - electrical.
It's just all electricity, everywhere, all the time!
This also serves to undermine their credibility.
Plasmoids, not black holes:
More evidence:
inthebeginning
New member
In my opinion, no matter how much the theory of Lemaitre has been modified. The idea of this man is about a primitive atom located in the middle of nothing and that suddenly exploited and expanded.
This idea touches the limits of the absurd. He stated that the whole matter of the universe was compressed in such a microscopic particle. I have no idea how and why scientists of those years "accepted" that hypothesis unless they were nuts or they planned a fraud or something. No one in his complete sense will accept such a ridiculous idea.
This idea touches the limits of the absurd. He stated that the whole matter of the universe was compressed in such a microscopic particle. I have no idea how and why scientists of those years "accepted" that hypothesis unless they were nuts or they planned a fraud or something. No one in his complete sense will accept such a ridiculous idea.
It's worse even than your comments suggest. It wasn't merely microscopic. It was infinitesimally small - literally. That is, it was INFINITELY small, as in mathematically zero volume. And not even just zero volume really because volume presupposes space. They posit that space itself (and time, by the way) was reduced to zero. So the big bang happened nowhere and everywhere at no time and at every moment.
Complete stupidity.