Big bang... a big NO!

[inthebeginning]

Yeah all those ignorant stupid physicists and cosmologists.

I have the strong feeling that relativists found in that idea an opportunity to make believe that their theory is useful after all and invented calculations of time dilatation for the fast speed of matter at the beginning of that explosion and similar fantasies.

In other words, relativists have been using silly ideas of others to make them famous so they can keep deceiving people that Relativity theory is a scientific approach.

Check about Black Holes, another celestial body invented in a piece of paper, and now is so famous even when is nothing but another fantasy originated by abstract mathematics that have nothing to do with physical reality.

Then, those physicists and cosmologists are not stupid after all but are making great profit by making idiots to millions and millions of people around the world.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Yeah all those ignorant stupid physicists and cosmologists.

... Who need to get paid so they can feed their families...

The threat of losing their job tends to make people fall in line even if the ideas being promoted are a little ridiculous.

 

[Avajs]

... Who need to get paid so they can feed their families...

The threat of losing their job tends to make people fall in line even if the ideas being promoted are a little ridiculous.

Oh my, the cynicism is incredible.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Oh my, the cynicism is incredible.

So is your naïveté.

 

[Right Divider]

So is your naïveté.

Come on JR. Don't you know that experts cannot be wrong... especially when a whole bunch of them agree?

 

[Clete]

Yeah all those ignorant stupid physicists and cosmologists.

Intelligence and stupidity are not mutually exclusive.

Modern cosmological "science" hasn't been real science for a century now. It's mathematics, not physics. There is a BIG difference!

The Big Bang (and other similar kinds of "scientific" reasoning) violates the basic principles of rational thought:

“Nothing” cannot cause “something.”

“Nowhere” and “no time” cannot generate location and sequence.

And calling a breakdown in your equations (e.g. infinite density at zero volume - a contradiction) a “fact” about reality is logically dishonest.

To say “the universe began as a point of infinite density with no space or time” is not a scientific explanation, it’s a metaphysics masquerading as science. It’s not reasoned inference, it's a contradiction. It’s math-speak for "we don't know." A point that more and more people who make their living in these fields are willing to say out loud.

A more coherent view is that the universe began in an ordered, rational way, consistent with cause and effect, sequence, and existence and that does not require it to begin as a literal singularity, and certainly not as a violation of its own physical laws.

If reason is real, which it must be for science to take place at all, then the origin of the universe must be logically coherent, not metaphysically nonsensical.