I almost missed this.
I already tried granting that for the sake of argument earlier.
Suppose your removal system could exist.
Suppose the constitution could establish it.
Suppose the procedure could be written down. The same structural questions still remain:
Who operates it?
Who judges whether they have acted lawfully?
Who removes the removers?
And if those men have final authority to remove the king, how is final earthly authority still terminating in the king rather than in them?
This is not really about waiting for me to concede that your system can exist “in principle.” I granted that hypothetically, and the same problem remained. You still refused to engage.
The issue is not whether words can be written on paper creating a removal process. Of course they can. The issue is whether such a process preserves the king as the final earthly civil authority, or whether it transfers final earthly authority to the men empowered to remove him.
That is the question you keep avoiding.
