Daniel accurately described the interior walls of the kings hall.

[VladtheDestroyer]

Some months ago, a fellow German speaking YEC made me aware of this little gem:

From "Das wieder erstehende Babylon, die bisherigen Ergebnisse der deutschen Ausgrabungen“ (The results of the German excavations of Ancient Bablyon), p.103, R. Koldewey (1913)

Das wieder erstehende Babylon, die bisherigen ergebnisse der deutschen ausgrabungen : Koldewey, Robert : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

vii, 328 p. 26 cm

archive.org

Page 103 describes the largest room of the excavated palace, which certainly would have served as the kings hall.


"Daß die Wände dieser Räume mit weißem Gipsputz versehen waren..."

Translated

"We saw that the walls of this room were covered in white plaster"


Of course Daniel already knew this, because he was there.

Daniel 5:5 In the same hour the fingers of a man’s hand appeared and wrote opposite the lampstand on the plaster of the wall of the king’s palace; and the king saw the part of the hand that wrote.


Wikipedia also has fairly extensive list of items pertaining to biblical archaeology, if anyone is interested in things like that. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_inscriptions_in_biblical_archaeology

 

[Nick M]

Along those lines I saw an interview of a man who says an Egyptian artifact very closely resembles the Exodus.

 

[Nick M]

Here is more archaeological news. The Bible is not a history book, but there is history in it. You could easily invalidate it. But they can't. This is why they dated the Exodus wrong, so they can claim there is no evidence. In this one, if there was no burning, then they would not be looking at what they thought they were looking at.