First, there are no Darwinists in the world today. The theorem of evolution today includes natural selection and genetics.
Apes and Humans had a common ancestor.
-
This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
Dinosaurs are fake and leads to atheism!
- Thread starter Ktoyou
- Start date
Apes and Humans had a common ancestor.
Right Divider
Body part
Again.... when life ALREADY exists, these things work.
Duh. Yes, that is what the Creation model explains, but the Evolution model fails miserably.
False and anti-science.
Only in your fairy tale fantasy.
Right Divider
Body part
Neither of those support your fairy tale and both are fully compatible with the Creation model.
Nope... again, only in your fairy tale fantasy.
God created the chemicals, processes, and components of life, including molecules men say are "self-assembling", but everyone knows those molecules were never "self-creating."
Unsaved barbarians who deliberately reject God in favor of sin may be animals, but their fathers were not mindless and soulless beasts of the field no matter what the Darwinidiots may think.
Darwin lived in the 19th century, dude. He was still a better scientist than any modern day creationist. Our understanding of evolution has dwarfed Darwin's ideas. Who in their right mind would immortalize and worship one man?
The creation model adds one non-parsimonious element: a designer.
Why?
Idolater
"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Begging the question.
Darwin believed humans evolved from apes and that black humans were more closely linked to their animal ancestors, which is why he called them "savages." Don't call Darwin a scientist. He was a deluded racist.
Right Divider
Body part
No kidding. Thanks for the news flash.
Nonsense. Is writing falsehoods your favorite way to spend your time?
Yes, there are MANY more falsehoods in the neo-Darwinist camp today.
Anyone that worships God in the flesh, as they should.
Who in their right mind would believe that design exists without a Designer?
Why do you believe in the myth that men and apes share a common ancestor? Because you've rejected the truth.
Is Kent Hovind on this forum?
Right Divider
Body part
You try to hide with distraction.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
I find it very easy to just ignore him. When I do see him in reflection I'm either looking at a troll or a tard
Right Divider
Body part
More like a trolltard.
makes sense
Hovind was right to refer to evolutionism as a "false religion."
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Exactly
When he does attempt to discuss things intelligently his argumentation is peppered with fallacies and flaws and outright inaccuracies.
It appears he was involved in domestic violence and tax fraud. The latter is more relevant. He does not have a reputation for accuracy.
Hovind has been in some real messes, but that does not mean Darwin was right to believe blacks descended from monkeys and could be showcased in cages to demonstrate evolution.
In 1904 a man named Ota Benga was removed from the Congo in Central Africa and placed in the New York City Bronx Zoo, in a cage with primates. He spent his nights at the Monkey house. He was on display as living proof of Darwin's theory of evolution.
This is called "poisoning the well." It's a fallacy for a reason.
NONE of it is relevant to this discussion.
Then why doesn't life spout up all over the place?
Some plant, animal or person dies and there sits a whole pile of every possible molecule that could ever be wanted for a new life-form to spout into existence and yet nothing but death and decay happens. Even after weeks and months of decay, all the molecules that you say are needed for life to form spontaneously are still in huge abundance and yet, still, nothing happens. Even with the lion's share of the work done for it, life still can't seem to spout into existence even from recently living tissue!
And you know what? Nothing ever will happen either! No matter what you do, no matter how perfect you want to set up the lab conditions, no matter what other crap you add to the recipe or how much time you give it, all you will have at the end of your experiment is lifeless blob of goo.
Clete