Director of X-MEN named a boy-molester predator...

Nazaroo

Nazaroo

New member
Should this be a surprise, when the LGBT agenda was
basically the whole theme behind X-MEN?





Days-image-5.jpg



Hollywood pedophile parties: Symptom of a rampant disease feeding on innocent children



DALLAS, May 15, 2014 — X-Men director Bryan Singer is accused of being involved in a series of pedophile parties where young boys were molested. Along with Singer, producer Gary Goddard, former Disney exec David Neuman and executive Garth Ancier are alleged to have been involved in the targeting and victimization of young boys.
The accusations against Singer emerged when Michael Egan, a former child actor and model, filed civil suits against Singer, Goddard, Neuman and Ancier. Egan told the New York Post that during the 1990’s, he and other young boys were treated “like pieces of meat at sex parties.” His attorney Jeff Herman has stated that since filing suit, he has been contacted by other victims who have broken their silence in the hopes of saving the next child from suffering as they have.
The New York Post also reports Egan’s mother previously reported the abuse to the LAPD and FBI and no action was taken.

Singer and the others named by Egan have has vehemently denied the accusations against them.

Read more at http://www.commdiginews.com/life/ho...-innocent-children-17588/#oLkFGg0DBaHKeQmU.99


 
Nazaroo

Nazaroo

New member
Quetzal said:
More groundless slanders. :yawn:
Click to expand...

Right.

The witness of the victims is discounted,
while the criminals walk free.

Shouldn't there be an investigation, a trial,
the weighing of testimony by judge and jury?

Or do you believe in dismissing accusations
against rich and powerful people (favouritism)?

What is your solution?

Should cops not follow up?

Epstein pled GUILTY in return for favoritism, special treatment
and the quashing of mountains of evidence that
incriminated many more rich people.

Do you think Epstein lied just to get a light sentence?
That he is really innocent of all charges of pedophilia and child trafficking?

Or do you think that child-trafficking is not a criminal offence?
Maybe the age of consent should be lowered to say, 12 or 13?

Please tell us.
 
Quetzal

Quetzal

New member
Nazaroo said:
Right.

The witness of the victims is discounted,
while the criminals walk free.

Shouldn't there be an investigation, a trial,
the weighing of testimony by judge and jury?

Or do you believe in dismissing accusations
against rich and powerful people (favouritism)?

What is your solution?

Should cops not follow up?

Epstein pled GUILTY in return for favoritism, special treatment
and the quashing of mountains of evidence that
incriminated many more rich people.

Do you think Epstein lied just to get a light sentence?
That he is really innocent of all charges of pedophilia and child trafficking?

Or do you think that child-trafficking is not a criminal offence?
Maybe the age of consent should be lowered to say, 12 or 13?

Please tell us.
Click to expand...
Was there an investigation? What were the results?
 
shagster01

shagster01

New member
Nazaroo said:
Another illiterate slob.

The titled doesn't declare him guilty.

It states a historical fact.

Learn to read.

Director of X-MEN named a boy-molester predator...
Click to expand...

It is historical alright. Over a year historical with the resolve a part of that history too.
 
TracerBullet

TracerBullet

New member
Nazaroo said:
Another illiterate slob.

The titled doesn't declare him guilty.

It states a historical fact.

Learn to read.

Director of X-MEN named a boy-molester predator...
Click to expand...

You call Shagster an "illiterate slob" but you are the one who didn't read his post correctly
 
Quetzal

Quetzal

New member
You cannot prove he was guilty and the legal system couldn't either. In fact, it didn't even make it that far since the charges were dropped.
 
S

Sancocho

New member
Quetzal said:
You cannot prove he was guilty and the legal system couldn't either. In fact, it didn't even make it that far since the charges were dropped.
Click to expand...

The atheist/agnostic perception is that is something can't be proved by evidence or consensus it isn't truth or doesn't exist. This has nothing to do with reality and actually shows this concept of "truth" is as fickle in nature as their believers.
 
Quetzal

Quetzal

New member
Sancocho said:
The atheist/agnostic perception is that is something can't be proved by evidence or consensus it isn't truth or doesn't exist. This has nothing to do with reality and actually shows this concept of "truth" is as fickle in nature as their believers.
Click to expand...
Evidence has everything to do with reality. What is the alternative? You take everything someone claims as fact with no research or critical thought? If someone tells me it's raining outside, I expect to hear the rain drops on the tin roof.
 
shagster01

shagster01

New member
Sancocho said:
The atheist/agnostic perception is that is something can't be proved by evidence or consensus it isn't truth or doesn't exist. This has nothing to do with reality and actually shows this concept of "truth" is as fickle in nature as their believers.
Click to expand...

Sancocho is a child molester. I don't have evidence or consensus to prove this, but Sancocho says I don't need it. So there you have it. I hereby declare Sancocho guilty of child molestation.
 
S

Sancocho

New member
Quetzal said:
Evidence has everything to do with reality. What is the alternative? You take everything someone claims as fact with no research or critical thought? If someone tells me it's raining outside, I expect to hear the rain drops on the tin roof.
Click to expand...

Where is the evidence that morals are important? Can you see them or touch them? A materialistic outlook can never explain why humans see morals as important. In fact few spend more time talking about right and wrong than atheists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top